Thanks. Since this seems like a clear win I'll start the vote thread. Any
other thoughts are welcome, of course.
Ismael
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Damian Guy wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 at 10:20 Rajini Sivaram
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ismael,
> >
> > Thank you for looking into this. So
+1
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 at 10:20 Rajini Sivaram wrote:
> Hi Ismael,
>
> Thank you for looking into this. Sounds like a good improvement.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> > Sounds good to me.
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Ismael Jum
Hi Ismael,
Thank you for looking into this. Sounds like a good improvement.
Regards,
Rajini
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Sounds good to me.
>
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> > Thanks Guozhang.
> >
> > Cherry-picking also occurred to me so
Sounds good to me.
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks Guozhang.
>
> Cherry-picking also occurred to me sometime after I sent the email and I
> agree that it's useful functionality.
>
> Do I understand correctly that you are suggesting a script for
> cherry-picking afte
Thanks Guozhang.
Cherry-picking also occurred to me sometime after I sent the email and I
agree that it's useful functionality.
Do I understand correctly that you are suggesting a script for
cherry-picking after the pull request has been merged? We could explore
this, but not sure it would add mu
Thanks Ismael for initiating this discussion. I am in favor for adopting
Gitbox for its clean improvements since many of us have shared the pain of
managing PRs for long time.
About this potential downsides, subjectively I feel these two arguments are
quite handle-able. The only concern I had abou
One thing I forgot to mention, many projects have requested and been using
GitBox for a while:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15271?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20AND%20component%20%3D%20GitBox%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DES
