Thanks Jay. Since we have enough votes now, I'll mark this as adopted.
Aditya
From: Jay Kreps [jay.kr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 8:42 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
Awesome. +1
On Sunday
uration-Migrationplanfornotifications
>
> Thanks,
> Aditya
>
> From: Jay Kreps [jay.kr...@gmail.com ]
> Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 9:51 AM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
>
> 1. G
Jay Kreps [jay.kr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 9:51 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
1. Great.
2. I don't have a preference as to the casing, but I really appreciate
consistency. Is everything using underscores today? If so let's stick
ounced. So we do need to handle notifications in the old format. Should we
> simply ignore older changes since they are only valid for a short period of
> time?
>
> Thanks,
> Aditya
>
> From: Jay Kreps [jay.kr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 28
Auradkar
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 11:22 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
Yeah, the same cleaning mechanism will be carried over.
> 1. Are we introducing a new Java API for the config change protocol and if
> so where will that appear? Is that going
nce they are only valid for a short period of time?
Thanks,
Aditya
From: Jay Kreps [jay.kr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 5:25 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
That is handled now so I am assuming the same mechanism carries over?
-Jay
nkedin.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > bump
> > >
> > > ____________
> > > From: Aditya Auradkar
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 1:16 PM
> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dyn
, Aditya Auradkar <
> aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > bump
> >
> >
> > From: Aditya Auradkar
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 1:16 PM
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] KIP-21
5 at 11:41 AM, Aditya Auradkar <
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:
> bump
>
>
> From: Aditya Auradkar
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 1:16 PM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
>
&
5 at 11:41 AM, Aditya Auradkar <
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:
> bump
>
>
> From: Aditya Auradkar
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 1:16 PM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
>
&
___
> From: Aditya Auradkar
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 11:26 AM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
>
> I think we should remove the config part in TopicMetadataResponse. It's
> probably cleaner if
+1 (non binding)
> On May 28, 2015, at 11:41 AM, Aditya Auradkar
> wrote:
>
> bump
>
>
> From: Aditya Auradkar
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 1:16 PM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic C
bump
From: Aditya Auradkar
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 1:16 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
Hey everyone,
Completed the changes to KIP-4. After today's hangout, there doesn't appear to
be anything
1, 2015 11:26 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
I think we should remove the config part in TopicMetadataResponse. It's
probably cleaner if Alter and Describe are the only way to view and modify
configs but I don't feel very strongly about it.
ed AlterConfig. If no-one objects, I can make some changes to
>>KIP-4
>> to reflect this.
>>
>> Aditya
>>
>>
>> From: Jay Kreps [jay.kr...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:51 AM
>> To: dev@kafk
Configuration" error code to "InvalidEntityConfig" as
proposed in KIP-21.
Aditya
From: Jun Rao [j...@confluent.io]
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 10:50 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
What about To
ange "InvalidTopicConfiguration" error code to "InvalidEntityConfig"
> as proposed in KIP-21.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Aditya
>
>
> From: Jun Rao [j...@confluent.io]
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 8:41 AM
> To
, May 21, 2015 8:41 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
Aditya,
For completeness, could you list the set of error codes in the wiki? Also,
could you summarize the changes that are needed for the requests listed in
KIP-4 and update the wiki accordingly?
Thanks,
Jun
On
__
> From: Andrii Biletskyi [andrii.bilets...@stealth.ly]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 2:26 PM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I wasn't able to participate. I don't have objections abou
Configuration
>
> Aditya
>
> From: Andrii Biletskyi [andrii.bilets...@stealth.ly]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 2:26 PM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I wasn
rii.bilets...@stealth.ly]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 2:26 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
Hi,
Sorry I wasn't able to participate. I don't have objections about removing
config changes from AlterTopic (as I understand both AddedConfig and
DeletedConfi
tedConfig => string
> >
> > The downside of this approach is that we will have 2 separate ways of
> > changing topic configs (AlterTopic and AlterConfig). While a general
> > AlterConfig only makes sense if we plan to have more than two types of
> > entity configs.. it'
If no-one objects, I can make some changes to KIP-4 to
reflect this.
Aditya
From: Jay Kreps [jay.kr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:51 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
Hey Aditya,
Two comments:
1. Yeah
types of
> entity configs.. it's definitely more future proof. Thoughts?
>
> Aditya
>
>
> From: Todd Palino [tpal...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 12:39 PM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
>
> Agree with Jun
ure proof. Thoughts?
Aditya
From: Todd Palino [tpal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 12:39 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-21 Dynamic Configuration
Agree with Jun here on the JSON format. I think your intention was likely
to have actual JSON here and it was just a typo
Agree with Jun here on the JSON format. I think your intention was likely
to have actual JSON here and it was just a typo in the wiki?
-Todd
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Aditya,
>
> Another thing to consider. In KIP-4, we are adding a new RPC request to
> change and retrie
Aditya,
Another thing to consider. In KIP-4, we are adding a new RPC request to
change and retrieve topic configs. Do we want to add a similar RPC request
to change configs per client id? If so, do we want to introduce a separate
new request or have a combined new request for both topic and client
27 matches
Mail list logo
