alias config as an example.
Even if I satisfy your concerns, that would still leave the KIP with only +2
votes.
-Original Message-
From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto:rajinisiva...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 2:31 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [REMINDER] KIP-383 Pluggable interface
KIP says this is left for another KIP, though we might want to think
> about it now.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto:rajinisiva...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 10:54 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [REMINDER] KIP-383 Pluggab
0:54 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [REMINDER] KIP-383 Pluggable interface for SSL Factory
Not yet a vote, but almost there. Just wanted to clarify reconfiguration
before voting.
So the advantage of making `SslEngineFactory` reconfigurable is that it can
define custom configs which may be re
> -Original Message-
> From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto:rajinisiva...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 4:35 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [REMINDER] KIP-383 Pluggable interface for SSL Factory
>
> Hi Clement,
>
> Thanks for the KIP, it is looking good. Do you by any
Sivaram [mailto:rajinisiva...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 4:35 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [REMINDER] KIP-383 Pluggable interface for SSL Factory
Hi Clement,
Thanks for the KIP, it is looking good. Do you by any chance have a PR that
you can attach to the JIRA? It wasn't
gt; https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@kafka.apache.org:lte=1M:kip-383
> > > > > I don't understand why this feature is not more popular.
> > > > > It's the solution to one Jira and a work-around for a handful more
> Jiras.
> > > > >
> &g
Jiras.
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Damian Guy [mailto:damian@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 7:38 AM
> > > > To: dev
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] [REMINDER] KIP-383 Pluggable interface for SSL
> > > Factory
> > > >
> > > > Hi Clement,
> > > >
> > > > You should start a separate thread for the vote, i.e., one with a
> > > > subject
> > > > of [VOTE] KIP-383 ...
> > > >
> > > > Looks like you haven't done this?
> > >
t; >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Damian Guy [mailto:damian....@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 7:38 AM
> > > To: dev
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] [REMINDER] KIP-383 Pluggable interface for SSL
> > Factory
> > >
> > > Hi Clement,
> > >
> > > You should start a separate thread for the vote, i.e., one with a subject
> > > of [VOTE] KIP-383 ...
> > >
> > > Looks like you haven't done this?
> >
ul more Jiras.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Damian Guy [mailto:damian@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 7:38 AM
> > To: dev
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] [REMINDER] KIP-383 Pluggable interface for SSL
> Factory
> >
> > Hi Cle
understand why this feature is not more popular.
> It's the solution to one Jira and a work-around for a handful more Jiras.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Damian Guy [mailto:damian@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 7:38 AM
> To: dev
> Subject:
lto:damian@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 7:38 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [REMINDER] KIP-383 Pluggable interface for SSL Factory
Hi Clement,
You should start a separate thread for the vote, i.e., one with a subject
of [VOTE] KIP-383 ...
Looks like you haven't done this?
Pellerin, Clement wrote:
> > I'm new here. Is this vote binding or not?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Harsha [mailto:ka...@harsha.io]
> > Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2018 1:59 PM
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] [REMINDER]
pache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [REMINDER] KIP-383 Pluggable interface for SSL Factory
>
> Overall LGTM. +1.
>
> Thanks,
> Harsha
I'm new here. Is this vote binding or not?
-Original Message-
From: Harsha [mailto:ka...@harsha.io]
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2018 1:59 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [REMINDER] KIP-383 Pluggable interface for SSL Factory
Overall LGTM. +1.
Thanks,
Harsha
Overall LGTM. +1.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018, at 12:52 PM, Pellerin, Clement wrote:
> So far, there are no votes on this KIP. Please help me fix KAFKA-6654 by
> voting for this fix.
> Improvement comments are also welcome.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pellerin, Clement
> Sen
So far, there are no votes on this KIP. Please help me fix KAFKA-6654 by voting
for this fix.
Improvement comments are also welcome.
-Original Message-
From: Pellerin, Clement
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 2:17 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] KIP-383 Pluggable interfac
16 matches
Mail list logo
