Hi Allen,
As the JIRA says, KAFKA-3100 has already been integrated into the 0.9.0
branch and will be part of 0.9.0.1.
Ismael
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Allen Wang wrote:
> Hi Jun,
>
> What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3100?
>
> Thanks,
> Allen
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 20
Hi Jun,
What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3100?
Thanks,
Allen
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi Becket,
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Becket Qin wrote:
>
> > I am taking KAFKA-3177 off the list because the correct fix might involve
> > some re
Hi Becket,
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Becket Qin wrote:
> I am taking KAFKA-3177 off the list because the correct fix might involve
> some refactoring of exception hierarchy in new consumer. That may take some
> time and 0.9.0.1 probably does not need to block on it.
>
Sounds good to me.
Hi Jun,
I am taking KAFKA-3177 off the list because the correct fix might involve
some refactoring of exception hierarchy in new consumer. That may take some
time and 0.9.0.1 probably does not need to block on it.
Please let me know if you think we should have it fixed in 0.9.0.1.
Thanks,
Jiang
Hi, Everyone,
We have fixed a few critical bugs since 0.9.0.0 was released and are still
investigating a few more issues. The current list of issues tracked for
0.9.0.1 can be found below. Among them, only KAFKA-3159 seems to be
critical.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2
