Ewen,
Thanks for your comments on this - It’s really useful context and it would be
great to include a note summarizing this in the contributor guidelines,
especially for connectors.
Unfortunately I missed (sorry) the “rejected alternatives” discussed in KIP-26
when I wrote KIP-310. It probab
Hey all,
Sorry I haven't been closely following the threads on this, but I think I
can provide a bit more color.
Jakub, re: general policy, I'll take the blame that the relevant "rejected
alternatives" section in the KIP
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58851767#KI
I am not aware of anything like this. And I also think, it's difficult
to generalize. So far, each feature is discussed on a per-case basis.
Because it's hard to draw the boarder line we might be too restrictive
or too loose in a "project charter", thus, scaring people from starting
KIPs, what wou
Hi community,
I noticed following argument in the discussion about KIP-310.
> However, I don't think the apache/kafka repository is the right place to
host such a Connector.
I was wondering whether there is some project charter describing what does
and what does not belong to the Apache Kafka pr
