So I have just created a PR implementation this that does not require
adding a new SecurityProtocol as originally suggested, i.e. you can use
PLAINTEXT://127.0.0.1:9092,PLAINTEXT://[::1]:9092 but it only passes the
validation in the specific case of having 2 addresses on the same port with
one bein
Hi Colin,
Would you be able to describe how the change would affect public
interfaces? As far as I understand this would have only required loosening
the current validation within Kafka which shouldn't create any public
facing breaking changes, or maybe I am missing something.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021
Hi Matthew,
I think you should create a KIP for this proposal, since it is a change to our
public interfaces. Also, there are some subtle questions that we need to
answer, like do the ipv4 and ipv6 interfaces that share the same port also have
to share the same security protocol?
best,
Colin
Hello everyone,
I wanted to ask if anyone has any thoughts/objections regarding Kafka
allowing multiple listeners of the same port as long as one is IPv4 and the
other is IPv6, i.e.
listeners=PLAINTEXT://127.0.0.1:9092,PLAINTEXTV6://[::1]:9092
listener.security.protocol.map=PLAINTEXT:PLAINTEXT,PL
