The (2)'s have it. I will put up a patch using this approach.
-Jay
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1 on 2
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Jay Kreps wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > There was several previous discussions on metrics for the new clients but
> > I'm n
+1 on 2
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Jay Kreps wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> There was several previous discussions on metrics for the new clients but
> I'm not sure had a unanimous consensus on the best approach. I'd put
> forward the following options:
> 1. Plain vanilla JMX (no one actually want
+1 for (2).
Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Jay Kreps wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> There was several previous discussions on metrics for the new clients but
> I'm not sure had a unanimous consensus on the best approach. I'd put
> forward the following options:
> 1. Plain vanilla JMX (no
+1 for (2)
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Joe Stein wrote:
> +1 for (2)
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Jay Kreps wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > There was several previous discussions on metrics for the new clients but
> > I'm not sure had a unanimous consensus on the best approach.
+1 for (2)
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Jay Kreps wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> There was several previous discussions on metrics for the new clients but
> I'm not sure had a unanimous consensus on the best approach. I'd put
> forward the following options:
> 1. Plain vanilla JMX (no one actually
Hey all,
There was several previous discussions on metrics for the new clients but
I'm not sure had a unanimous consensus on the best approach. I'd put
forward the following options:
1. Plain vanilla JMX (no one actually wanted this, but for completeness...)
2. Improve on custom metrics package cu
