records when aggregating versioned tables.
>> > >>> - In order to implement this change, table aggregate
>> processors need
>> > >>> a way to determine whether a record is out-of-order or not.
>> This
>> > >>> cannot
c format
> > >>> (with upgrade implications properly handled) via KIP-904
> > >>> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-904%3A+Kafka+Streams+-+Guarantee+subtractor+is+called+before+adder+if+key+has+not+changed
> >,
>
ional change to the repartition topic format to
> >>> add a
> >>> timestamp comes at no additional cost to users.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I have updated the KIP
> >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
te: Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-914 Join Processor Semantics for Versioned Stores
To:
Thanks for voting, everyone! We have three binding yes votes with no
objections during four full days of voting. I will close the vote and mark
the KIP as accepted, right in time f
e
> > these changes along with the rest of KIP-914 in the 3.5 release.
> >
> > Apologies for not noticing these additional semantics implications earlier,
> > Victoria
> >
> > -- Forwarded message -
> > From: Victoria Xia
> > Date: We
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-914 Join Processor Semantics for Versioned Stores
To:
Thanks for voting, everyone! We have three binding yes votes with no
objections during four full days of voting. I will close the vote and mark
the KIP as accepted, right in time for the 3.5 release.
Thanks,
Victoria
On W
along with the rest of KIP-914 in the 3.5 release.
Apologies for not noticing these additional semantics implications earlier,
Victoria
-- Forwarded message -
From: Victoria Xia
Date: Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-914 Join Processor Semantics for Version
Thanks for voting, everyone! We have three binding yes votes with no
objections during four full days of voting. I will close the vote and mark
the KIP as accepted, right in time for the 3.5 release.
Thanks,
Victoria
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 7:11 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks
+1 (binding)
Thanks Victoria!
Best,
Bruno
On 20.03.23 17:13, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 3/20/23 9:05 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
+1, thank you Victoria!
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 8:27 AM Victoria Xia
wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to start a vote on KIP-914 for updating the Kafka Stream
+1 (binding)
On 3/20/23 9:05 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
+1, thank you Victoria!
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 8:27 AM Victoria Xia
wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to start a vote on KIP-914 for updating the Kafka Streams join
processors to use proper timestamp-based semantics in applications with
versioned
+1, thank you Victoria!
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 8:27 AM Victoria Xia
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-914 for updating the Kafka Streams join
> processors to use proper timestamp-based semantics in applications with
> versioned stores:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/d
Hi all,
I'd like to start a vote on KIP-914 for updating the Kafka Streams join
processors to use proper timestamp-based semantics in applications with
versioned stores:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-914%3A+Join+Processor+Semantics+for+Versioned+Stores
To avoid compatibili
12 matches
Mail list logo
