Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

Thanks for the KIP Philip. +1 binding. On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 9:55 AM Philip Nee wrote: > > Thanks all. Will find time to get the patch out. > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 7:42 AM Federico Valeri > wrote: > > > +1 (non binding) > > Thanks > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:18 AM Rajini Sivaram

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

Thanks all. Will find time to get the patch out. On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 7:42 AM Federico Valeri wrote: > +1 (non binding) > Thanks > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:18 AM Rajini Sivaram > wrote: > > > > Hi Philip, > > > > +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP! > > > > Regards, > > > > Rajini > > > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

+1 (non binding) Thanks On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:18 AM Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > Hi Philip, > > +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP! > > Regards, > > Rajini > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:52 PM Philip Nee wrote: > > > Thanks for the vote. We've decided to make a minor change to the default > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

Hi Philip, +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP! Regards, Rajini On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:52 PM Philip Nee wrote: > Thanks for the vote. We've decided to make a minor change to the default > timeout from 5min to 2min. > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:42 AM David Jacot > wrote: > > > +1 (binding

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

Thanks for the vote. We've decided to make a minor change to the default timeout from 5min to 2min. On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:42 AM David Jacot wrote: > +1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP, Philip! > > Le mar. 25 avr. 2023 à 20:23, José Armando García Sancio > a écrit : > > > +1. Thanks for the d

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

+1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP, Philip! Le mar. 25 avr. 2023 à 20:23, José Armando García Sancio a écrit : > +1. Thanks for the design. Looking forward to the implementation. > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:49 AM Jason Gustafson > wrote: > > > > +1 Thanks Philip! > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 202

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

+1. Thanks for the design. Looking forward to the implementation. On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:49 AM Jason Gustafson wrote: > > +1 Thanks Philip! > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 7:49 AM Kirk True wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > On Apr 10, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Philip Nee wrote: > > > > > > Hey

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

+1 Thanks Philip! On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 7:49 AM Kirk True wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Apr 10, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Philip Nee wrote: > > > > Hey everyone! > > > > I'm starting a vote for KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail > > the Client

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

+1 (non-binding) > On Apr 10, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Philip Nee wrote: > > Hey everyone! > > I'm starting a vote for KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail > the Client > > Please refer to the discussion thread here: > https://li

[VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

Hey everyone! I'm starting a vote for KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client Please refer to the discussion thread here: https://lists.apache.org/thread/st84zzwnq5m3pkzd1r7jk9lmqdt9m98s Thanks! P