Thanks for the votes, everyone! I'll go ahead and close out this vote.
The vote passes with the following results:
* 3 binding +1 from Luke C, David J, and Mickael M
* 1 non-binding vote from Ziming
* No -1 votes
Thanks!
David
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 9:15 AM Mickael Maison wrote:
>
> Hi David,
Hi David,
Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding)
Thanks,
Mickael
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 4:00 AM deng ziming wrote:
>
> Thanks for this KIP,
>
> +1(non-binding) from me.
>
> --
> Best,
> Ziming
>
> > On Sep 28, 2022, at 10:05 PM, David Jacot
> > wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP. I re
Thanks for this KIP,
+1(non-binding) from me.
--
Best,
Ziming
> On Sep 28, 2022, at 10:05 PM, David Jacot wrote:
>
> +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP. I really like the approach!
>
> Best,
> David
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:20 AM Luke Chen wrote:
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> +1 (binding) from
+1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP. I really like the approach!
Best,
David
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:20 AM Luke Chen wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> +1 (binding) from me.
>
> Thank you
> Luke
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 11:02 PM David Arthur
> wrote:
>
> > Hey folks, I'd like to start a vote on KIP-868
Hi David,
+1 (binding) from me.
Thank you
Luke
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 11:02 PM David Arthur
wrote:
> Hey folks, I'd like to start a vote on KIP-868. This proposal adds
> lightweight transactions to the KRaft controller. These transactions
> will allow us to generate atomic batches of records
Hey folks, I'd like to start a vote on KIP-868. This proposal adds
lightweight transactions to the KRaft controller. These transactions
will allow us to generate atomic batches of records that exceed the
current limits of the metadata layer.
Here is the KIP:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dis
