Thanks Bill!!
Just to summarize: 4 binding +1 (Chris, Mickael, John and Bill), and 1
non-binding +1 (Robert)
Many thanks,
Jorge.
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 15:56, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> Recasting my vote +1(binding).
>
> I'm looking forward to this KIP!
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
> On Fri, J
Hi Jorge,
Recasting my vote +1(binding).
I'm looking forward to this KIP!
Thanks,
Bill
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:11 AM Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <
quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm pleased to announce that the KIP-821 has been accepted with 3 binding
> votes from Chris, Jo
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce that the KIP-821 has been accepted with 3 binding
votes from Chris, John, Mickael, 1 non-binding vote by Robert, and 1
binding vote to be confirmed by Bill.
Thank you all for your great feedback and contribution to the KIP!
Cheers,
Jorge.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at 1
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 10:42 PM Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to bump this vote thread. Currently it's missing 1 +1 binding vote
> to pass (2 +1 binding, 1 +1 non-binding).
>
> There has been additional discussions to consider a
Hi there,
Bumping this thread for visibility.
Cheers,
Jorge
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022, 19:23 John Roesler, wrote:
> Thanks, all!
>
> I've reviewed the current state of the KIP, and I'm still +1 (binding).
>
> Thanks,
> -John
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2022, at 12:03, Chris Egerton wrote:
> > +1 (binding). T
Thanks, all!
I've reviewed the current state of the KIP, and I'm still +1 (binding).
Thanks,
-John
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022, at 12:03, Chris Egerton wrote:
> +1 (binding). Thanks Jorge, great stuff!
>
> We should probably verify with the people that have already cast +1 votes
> that they're still on
+1 (binding). Thanks Jorge, great stuff!
We should probably verify with the people that have already cast +1 votes
that they're still on board, since the design has shifted a bit since the
last vote was casted.
On 2022/06/28 20:42:14 Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like
Hi everyone,
I'd like to bump this vote thread. Currently it's missing 1 +1 binding vote
to pass (2 +1 binding, 1 +1 non-binding).
There has been additional discussions to consider array access and
deep-scan (similar to JsonPath) but hasn't been included as part of this
KIP.
The only minor change
Thanks for the KIP, Jorge.
This looks like a great addition to Kafka Connect.
+1(binding)
-Bill
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 6:41 PM John Roesler wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP, Jorge!
>
> I’ve just looked over the KIP, and it looks good to me.
>
> I’m +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> On Thu, Apr
Thanks for the KIP, Jorge!
I’ve just looked over the KIP, and it looks good to me.
I’m +1 (binding)
Thanks,
John
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022, at 09:10, Chris Egerton wrote:
> This is a worthwhile addition to the SMTs that ship out of the box with
> Kafka Connect. +1 non-binding
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 202
This is a worthwhile addition to the SMTs that ship out of the box with
Kafka Connect. +1 non-binding
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022, 09:51 Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <
quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-821:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFK
Hi all,
I'd like to start a vote on KIP-821:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-821%3A+Connect+Transforms+support+for+nested+structures
Thanks,
Jorge
12 matches
Mail list logo