Re: [VOTE] KIP-794: Strictly Uniform Sticky Partitioner

Awesome, thanks! +1 from me as well. On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 5:50 PM Artem Livshits wrote: > Hi Guozhang, > > The current DefaultStreamPartitioner behavior is not changed by this KIP, > so I think we can track it separately. I've created a ticket: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-

Re: [VOTE] KIP-794: Strictly Uniform Sticky Partitioner

Hi Guozhang, The current DefaultStreamPartitioner behavior is not changed by this KIP, so I think we can track it separately. I've created a ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13880. -Artem On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 10:24 AM Guozhang Wang wrote: > Hello Artem, > > Thanks for

Re: [VOTE] KIP-794: Strictly Uniform Sticky Partitioner

Hello Artem, Thanks for proposing this KIP. I took a look at the current PR and also thought about its implications on Kafka Streams. Here are some thoughts: Today Kafka Streams use an explicit Partitioner --- note it is not implementing the Producer's Partitioner --- to determine the partition n

Re: [VOTE] KIP-794: Strictly Uniform Sticky Partitioner

Hi Artem, Thank you for all the work on this. I think it'll be quite impactful. +1 non-binding from me. Lucas On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 8:27 PM Luke Chen wrote: > Hi Artem, > > Thanks for the KIP and the patience during discussion! > +1 binding from me. > > Luke > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 3:43

Re: [VOTE] KIP-794: Strictly Uniform Sticky Partitioner

Hi Artem, Thanks for the KIP and the patience during discussion! +1 binding from me. Luke On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 3:43 AM Ismael Juma wrote: > Thanks for the KIP and for taking the time to address all the feedback. +1 > (binding) > > Ismael > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 4:52 PM Artem Livshits >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-794: Strictly Uniform Sticky Partitioner

Thanks for the KIP and for taking the time to address all the feedback. +1 (binding) Ismael On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 4:52 PM Artem Livshits wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to start a vote on > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-794%3A+Strictly+Uniform+Sticky+Partitioner > . >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-794: Strictly Uniform Sticky Partitioner

Hi Artem, Thanks for the KIP. This is a really nice improvement! +1 (binding) from me. David On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 9:35 PM Jun Rao wrote: > > Hi, Artem, > > Thanks for the KIP. +1 from me. > > Jun > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 4:52 PM Artem Livshits > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to

Re: [VOTE] KIP-794: Strictly Uniform Sticky Partitioner

Hi, Artem, Thanks for the KIP. +1 from me. Jun On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 4:52 PM Artem Livshits wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to start a vote on > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-794%3A+Strictly+Uniform+Sticky+Partitioner > . > > -Artem >

[VOTE] KIP-794: Strictly Uniform Sticky Partitioner

Hi all, I'd like to start a vote on https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-794%3A+Strictly+Uniform+Sticky+Partitioner . -Artem