Hi all,
The vote has passed with 3 binding +1s and 1 non-binding +1. Many thanks to
those who voted. If you do have any more comments or suggestions, please do
add them.
I will update the KIP page and rebase the PR.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Harsha Chintalapani
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
+1 (binding)
Harsha
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:28 AM Ismael Juma wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Ismael
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Rajini Sivaram <
> rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > I would like to initiate the voting process for KIP-60 (
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluenc
+1 (binding)
Ismael
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Rajini Sivaram <
rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I would like to initiate the voting process for KIP-60 (
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-60+-+Make+Java+client+classloading+more+flexible
> ).
> This is a simple
Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6
3AU
From: Rajini Sivaram
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Date: 01/07/2016 12:27
Subject:[VOTE] KIP-60: Make Java client class loading more
flexible
I would like to initiate the voting process for KIP-60 (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA
+1
-Jay
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote:
> I would like to initiate the voting process for KIP-60 (
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-60+-+Make+Java+client+classloading+more+flexible
> ).
> This is a simple set of changes that are fully compatible wi
I would like to initiate the voting process for KIP-60 (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-60+-+Make+Java+client+classloading+more+flexible).
This is a simple set of changes that are fully compatible with the existing
class loading in Kafka and enables Java clients to be run in
