Re: [VOTE] KIP-50: Move Authorizer to o.a.k.common package - Round 2

2016-05-02 Thread Ashish Singh
KIP-50 has passed with +6 (binding) and +3 (non-binding). Thanks everyone for reviews and votes! On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Don Bosco Durai wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > > > > On 4/28/16, 7:47 AM, "Jun Rao" wrote: > > >Ashish, > > > >Thanks for the proposal. +1 > > > >Jun > > > >On Mon, A

Re: [VOTE] KIP-50: Move Authorizer to o.a.k.common package - Round 2

2016-05-01 Thread Don Bosco Durai
+1 (non binding) On 4/28/16, 7:47 AM, "Jun Rao" wrote: >Ashish, > >Thanks for the proposal. +1 > >Jun > >On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Ashish Singh wrote: > >> Hey Guys, >> >> I would like to re-initiate the voting process for KIP-50: Move Authorizer >> to o.a.k.common package. KIP-50 is

Re: [VOTE] KIP-50: Move Authorizer to o.a.k.common package - Round 2

2016-04-28 Thread Jun Rao
Ashish, Thanks for the proposal. +1 Jun On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Ashish Singh wrote: > Hey Guys, > > I would like to re-initiate the voting process for KIP-50: Move Authorizer > to o.a.k.common package. KIP-50 is available here > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/K

Re: [VOTE] KIP-50: Move Authorizer to o.a.k.common package - Round 2

2016-04-27 Thread Guozhang Wang
+1. On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Harsha wrote: > > > +1 > > -Harsha > > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Grant Henke wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Gwen Shapira > > wr

Re: [VOTE] KIP-50: Move Authorizer to o.a.k.common package - Round 2

2016-04-27 Thread Ewen Cheslack-Postava
+1 On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Harsha wrote: > +1 > -Harsha > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Grant Henke wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Gwen Shapira > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Ashish Singh > > > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-50: Move Authorizer to o.a.k.common package - Round 2

2016-04-26 Thread Harsha
+1 -Harsha On Mon, Apr 25, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Grant Henke wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Ashish Singh > > wrote: > > > Hey Guys, > > > > > > I would like to re-initiate the voting process f

Re: [VOTE] KIP-50: Move Authorizer to o.a.k.common package - Round 2

2016-04-25 Thread Grant Henke
+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Ashish Singh > wrote: > > Hey Guys, > > > > I would like to re-initiate the voting process for KIP-50: Move > Authorizer > > to o.a.k.common package. KIP-50 is available here > > <

Re: [VOTE] KIP-50: Move Authorizer to o.a.k.common package - Round 2

2016-04-25 Thread Gwen Shapira
+1 On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Ashish Singh wrote: > Hey Guys, > > I would like to re-initiate the voting process for KIP-50: Move Authorizer > to o.a.k.common package. KIP-50 is available here >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-50: Move Authorizer to o.a.k.common package - Round 2

2016-04-25 Thread Jay Kreps
+1 -Jay On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Ashish Singh wrote: > Hey Guys, > > I would like to re-initiate the voting process for KIP-50: Move Authorizer > to o.a.k.common package. KIP-50 is available here > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-50+-+Move+Authorizer+to+o.a.k.

[VOTE] KIP-50: Move Authorizer to o.a.k.common package - Round 2

2016-04-25 Thread Ashish Singh
Hey Guys, I would like to re-initiate the voting process for KIP-50: Move Authorizer to o.a.k.common package. KIP-50 is available here . Associated PR is available here