Re: [VOTE] KIP-461 Improve Replica Fetcher behavior at handling partition failure

Yeah, will keep in mind. Thank you Colin. On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 1:45 PM Colin McCabe wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2019, at 11:49, Aishwarya Gune wrote: > > Thank you everyone for the discussion and voting for KIP-461 > > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-461+-+Improve+Repli

Re: [VOTE] KIP-461 Improve Replica Fetcher behavior at handling partition failure

On Mon, May 13, 2019, at 11:49, Aishwarya Gune wrote: > Thank you everyone for the discussion and voting for KIP-461 > . > Closing the vote on this KIP which passes with - I'

Re: [VOTE] KIP-461 Improve Replica Fetcher behavior at handling partition failure

Thank you everyone for the discussion and voting for KIP-461 . Closing the vote on this KIP which passes with - - 5 binding (Jason, Colin, Gwen, Jun, Harsha) - 1 non-bi

Re: [VOTE] KIP-461 Improve Replica Fetcher behavior at handling partition failure

Thanks for the KIP. +1(binding) Thanks, Harsha On May 9, 2019, 9:58 AM -0700, Jun Rao , wrote: > Hi, Aishwarya, > > Thanks for the KIP. +1 > > Jun > > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 4:30 PM Aishwarya Gune > wrote: > > > Hi All! > > > > I would like to call for a vote on KIP-461 that would improve the beh

Re: [VOTE] KIP-461 Improve Replica Fetcher behavior at handling partition failure

Hi, Aishwarya, Thanks for the KIP. +1 Jun On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 4:30 PM Aishwarya Gune wrote: > Hi All! > > I would like to call for a vote on KIP-461 that would improve the behavior > of replica fetcher in case of partition failure. The fetcher thread would > just stop monitoring the crashed

Re: [VOTE] KIP-461 Improve Replica Fetcher behavior at handling partition failure

+1 (binding) Thank you! I especially like the new metric for tracking the partitions with errors. Its those little things :) On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 4:30 PM Aishwarya Gune wrote: > Hi All! > > I would like to call for a vote on KIP-461 that would improve the behavior > of replica fetcher in case

Re: [VOTE] KIP-461 Improve Replica Fetcher behavior at handling partition failure

Thanks for the KIP! +1 (non-binding) On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 10:23 PM Colin McCabe wrote: > +1. Thanks, Aishwarya. > > Colin > > On Wed, May 8, 2019, at 17:50, Jason Gustafson wrote: > > +1. Thanks! > > > > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 4:30 PM Aishwarya Gune > > wrote: > > > > > Hi All! > > > > > > I

Re: [VOTE] KIP-461 Improve Replica Fetcher behavior at handling partition failure

+1. Thanks, Aishwarya. Colin On Wed, May 8, 2019, at 17:50, Jason Gustafson wrote: > +1. Thanks! > > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 4:30 PM Aishwarya Gune > wrote: > > > Hi All! > > > > I would like to call for a vote on KIP-461 that would improve the behavior > > of replica fetcher in case of partit

Re: [VOTE] KIP-461 Improve Replica Fetcher behavior at handling partition failure

+1. Thanks! On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 4:30 PM Aishwarya Gune wrote: > Hi All! > > I would like to call for a vote on KIP-461 that would improve the behavior > of replica fetcher in case of partition failure. The fetcher thread would > just stop monitoring the crashed partition instead of terminatin

[VOTE] KIP-461 Improve Replica Fetcher behavior at handling partition failure

Hi All! I would like to call for a vote on KIP-461 that would improve the behavior of replica fetcher in case of partition failure. The fetcher thread would just stop monitoring the crashed partition instead of terminating. Here's a link to the KIP - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KA