You're absolutely right. I realized that at some point after the initial
message and just tried to play it cool.
Sorry about that.
-John
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:59 AM Jun Rao wrote:
> The voting thread seems to be referring to the wrong KIP number. It should
> be KIP-442 instead of KIP-422.
The voting thread seems to be referring to the wrong KIP number. It should
be KIP-442 instead of KIP-422.
Thanks,
Jun
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 7:03 PM John Roesler wrote:
> Thanks all. The KIP-442 vote has passed with 3 binding votes (Guozhang,
> Bill, and Damian) and one non-binding vote (me) i
Thanks all. The KIP-442 vote has passed with 3 binding votes (Guozhang,
Bill, and Damian) and one non-binding vote (me) in favor and none against.
I'll update the KIP page.
-John
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:29 AM Damian Guy wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 21:38, John Roesler wrote:
>
>
+1
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 21:38, John Roesler wrote:
> Ah, good point, Guozhang. I'll remove that mention from the KIP.
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 3:30 PM Bill Bejeck wrote:
>
> > +1 for me,
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bill
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:13 PM Guozhang Wang
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 f
Ah, good point, Guozhang. I'll remove that mention from the KIP.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 3:30 PM Bill Bejeck wrote:
> +1 for me,
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:13 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > Though note that we cannot make such changes in older versions s
+1 for me,
Thanks,
Bill
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:13 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> Though note that we cannot make such changes in older versions since even
> if we release new versions out of those branches they are considered
> bug-fix only and hence should not have any interface
+1 from me.
Though note that we cannot make such changes in older versions since even
if we release new versions out of those branches they are considered
bug-fix only and hence should not have any interface impacting changes.
Guozhang
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:55 PM John Roesler wrote:
> Hi
Hi all,
Since the KIP is so small, I'm going to optimistically start the vote for
KIP-422 to remove our "max int" default max.poll.interval.ms in Streams and
fall back to the Consumer default of five minutes.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-442%3A+Return+to+default+max+poll+
