Thank you all for the votes and your comments!
KIP-415 has been accepted with +4 binding votes (Guozhang, Jason, Randall,
Ewen) and +4 non-binding votes (Ryanne, Rhys, Robert, Satish).
Best,
Konstantine
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:24 PM Satish Duggana
wrote:
> Nice work Konstantine!
> +1 (non-
Nice work Konstantine!
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 7:48 AM Ewen Cheslack-Postava
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Ewen
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:04 PM Randall Hauch wrote:
>
> > Excellent work, Konstantine!
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 8:05 PM Konstantine Kara
+1 (binding)
-Ewen
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:04 PM Randall Hauch wrote:
> Excellent work, Konstantine!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 8:05 PM Konstantine Karantasis <
> konstant...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jason!
> > That makes perfect sense. The change is reflected in th
Excellent work, Konstantine!
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 8:05 PM Konstantine Karantasis <
konstant...@confluent.io> wrote:
> Thanks Jason!
> That makes perfect sense. The change is reflected in the KIP now.
> "compatible" will be the default mode for "connect.protocol"
>
> Cheers,
> Kon
Thanks Jason!
That makes perfect sense. The change is reflected in the KIP now.
"compatible" will be the default mode for "connect.protocol"
Cheers,
Konstantine
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 4:31 PM Jason Gustafson wrote:
> +1 Thanks for all the work on this. My only minor comment is that
> `connect
+1 Thanks for all the work on this. My only minor comment is that
`connect.protocol` probably should be `compatible` by default. The cost is
low and it will save upgrade confusion.
Best,
Jason
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:37 AM Robert Yokota wrote:
> Thanks for the great KIP Konstantine!
>
> +1 (n
Thanks for the great KIP Konstantine!
+1 (non-binding)
Robert
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:56 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Thanks Konstantine, I've read the updated section on
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-415%3A+Incremental+Cooperative+Rebalancing+in+Kafka+Connect
> and i
Thanks Konstantine, I've read the updated section on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-415%3A+Incremental+Cooperative+Rebalancing+in+Kafka+Connect
and it lgtm.
I'm +1 on the KIP.
Guozhang
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:35 PM Konstantine Karantasis <
konstant...@confluent.io> wrot
Thanks Guozhang. This is a valid observation regarding the current status
of the PR.
I updated the KIP to explicitly call out how the downgrade process should
work in the section Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration.
Additionally, I reduced the configuration modes for the connect.protocol to
Hi Konstantine,
Thanks for the updated KIP and the PR as well (which is huge :) I briefly
looked through it as well as the KIP, and I have one minor comment to add
(otherwise I'm binding +1 on it as well) about the backward compatibility.
I'll use one example to illustrate the issue:
1) Suppose y
+1 (non-binding)
> On Mar 6, 2019, at 3:40 PM, Ryanne Dolan wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks!
> Ryanne
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019, 4:28 PM Konstantine Karantasis <
> konstant...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to open the vote on KIP-415: Incremental Cooperative Rebalancing
>> in Kafka
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks!
Ryanne
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019, 4:28 PM Konstantine Karantasis <
konstant...@confluent.io> wrote:
> I'd like to open the vote on KIP-415: Incremental Cooperative Rebalancing
> in Kafka Connect
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-415%3A+Incremental+Coo
I'd like to open the vote on KIP-415: Incremental Cooperative Rebalancing
in Kafka Connect
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-415%3A+Incremental+Cooperative+Rebalancing+in+Kafka+Connect
a proposal that will allow Kafka Connect to scale significantly the number
of connectors and
13 matches
Mail list logo
