exact this reason:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6386
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/20/17 3:33 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>&g
>>>> On 12/20/17 3:33 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Isn't it a little weird to make these constructors public but not
>>> also
>>>>>> expose the corresponding client construc
;>
>>>> On 12/20/17 3:33 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't it a little weird to make these constructors public but not
>> also
>>>>> expose the corresponding client constructors that use them?
>>&
; > >
> > > > -Jason
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Bill Bejeck
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Guozhang Wang >
> &g
, Guozhang Wang
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Tom Bentley
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> >
che.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6386
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/20/17 3:33 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
pose the corresponding client constructors that use them?
> > >>>
> > >>> -Jason
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Bill Bejeck
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > &
ng client constructors that use them?
> >>>
> >>> -Jason
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Bill Bejeck
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:09 PM
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Tom Bentley
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 18 December 2017 at 23:28, Vahid S Hashemian <
>>>>> vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com
>>&
Dec 19, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Tom Bentley
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> On 18 December 2017 at 23:28, Vahid S Hashemian <
> >>> vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com
> >>>>>
&g
ian <
>>> vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com
>>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the KIP.
>>>>>
>>>>> --Vahid
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
ian <
>>> vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com
>>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the KIP.
>>>>>
>>>>> --Vahid
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
gt; > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the KIP.
> > > >
> > > > --Vahid
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Ted Yu
> > > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > > > D
gt; wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks for the KIP.
> > >
> > > --Vahid
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Ted Yu
> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > > Date: 12/18/2017 02:45 PM
> > > Subject:
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Date: 12/18/2017 02:45 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-243: Make ProducerConfig and
> ConsumerConfig
> > constructors public
> >
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > nit: via "copy and past" an 'e'
+1
On 18 December 2017 at 23:28, Vahid S Hashemian
wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> --Vahid
>
>
>
> From: Ted Yu
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Date: 12/18/2017 02:45 PM
> Subject:Re: [VOTE] KIP-243: Make ProducerConfig and ConsumerCon
+1
Thanks for the KIP.
--Vahid
From: Ted Yu
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Date: 12/18/2017 02:45 PM
Subject:Re: [VOTE] KIP-243: Make ProducerConfig and ConsumerConfig
constructors public
+1
nit: via "copy and past" an 'e' is missing at the end.
On Mon,
+1
nit: via "copy and past" an 'e' is missing at the end.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to propose the following KIP:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 243%3A+Make+ProducerConfig+and+ConsumerConfig+constructors+public
>
>
> Thi
Hi,
I want to propose the following KIP:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-243%3A+Make+ProducerConfig+and+ConsumerConfig+constructors+public
This is a rather straight forward change, thus I skip the DISCUSS
thread and call for a vote immediately.
-Matthias
signature.asc
19 matches
Mail list logo
