t;
>
>
> From: Vahid S Hashemian/Silicon Valley/IBM
> To: dev
> Date: 12/19/2017 11:30 AM
> Subject:[VOTE] KIP-231: Improve the Required ACL of ListGroups API
>
>
> I believe the concerns on this KIP have been addressed so far.
> Therefore, I'd like to
KIP-231 is approved with 3 "+1" binding votes by Ewen, Jason, and Harsha.
Thanks to everyone who provided feedback and/or voted.
Regards.
--Vahid
From: Vahid S Hashemian/Silicon Valley/IBM
To: dev
Date: 12/19/2017 11:30 AM
Subject: [VOTE] KIP-231: Improve the Requi
con Valley/IBM
> To: dev < dev@kafka.apache.org >
> Date: 12/19/2017 11:30 AM
> Subject: [VOTE] KIP-231: Improve the Required ACL of ListGroups API
>
>
> I believe the concerns on this KIP have been addressed so far.
> Therefore, I'd like to start a vote.
Bump!
From: "Vahid S Hashemian"
To: dev
Date: 06/01/2018 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-231: Improve the Required ACL of ListGroups
API
I'm bumping this vote thread up as the KIP requires only one binding +1 to
pass.
The KIP is very similar in nature
APIs' minimum required
permissions more consistent.
Thanks.
--Vahid
From: Vahid S Hashemian/Silicon Valley/IBM
To: dev
Date: 12/19/2017 11:30 AM
Subject: [VOTE] KIP-231: Improve the Required ACL of ListGroups API
I believe the concerns on this KIP have been addres
bject:Re: [VOTE] KIP-231: Improve the Required ACL of ListGroups
API
+1. It's a little odd that we are still left with the anomalous cluster
permission for ListGroups. You mention in the rejected alternatives that
reducing permissions would make it impossible for admins to list group
t; Thanks.
>
>
>
> From: Ewen Cheslack-Postava
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Date: 01/02/2018 09:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-231: Improve the Required ACL of ListGroups
> API
>
>
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP Vahid, n
And this one requires two more binding +1's :)
Thanks.
From: Ewen Cheslack-Postava
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Date: 01/02/2018 09:50 PM
Subject:Re: [VOTE] KIP-231: Improve the Required ACL of ListGroups
API
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP Vahid, nice improvement!
-Ewe
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP Vahid, nice improvement!
-Ewen
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Vahid S Hashemian <
vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> I believe the concerns on this KIP have been addressed so far.
> Therefore, I'd like to start a vote.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
I believe the concerns on this KIP have been addressed so far.
Therefore, I'd like to start a vote.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-231%3A+Improve+the+Required+ACL+of+ListGroups+API
Thanks.
--Vahid
10 matches
Mail list logo
