Re: [VOTE] KIP-202

2017-09-26 Thread Guozhang Wang
More accurately, this KIP has received 3 binding +1 (Ismael, Damian, myself) and two non-binding +1 (Matthias, Bill). And 72 hours has passed without -1 votes, and hence we can conclude this thread as accepted. Guozhang On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Richard Yu wrote: > The vote has passed w

Re: [VOTE] KIP-202

2017-09-25 Thread Richard Yu
The vote has passed with 5++. We are now closing the vote. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote: > If no on else has opinions or votes on this thread, Richard could you close > the voting phase then? > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Ismael Juma wrote: > > > Thanks for the KI

Re: [VOTE] KIP-202

2017-09-25 Thread Guozhang Wang
If no on else has opinions or votes on this thread, Richard could you close the voting phase then? On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Ismael Juma wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding). > > On 19 Sep 2017 12:27 am, "Richard Yu" wrote: > > > Hello, I would like to start a VOTE thread on KIP-202

Re: [VOTE] KIP-202

2017-09-23 Thread Ismael Juma
Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding). On 19 Sep 2017 12:27 am, "Richard Yu" wrote: > Hello, I would like to start a VOTE thread on KIP-202. > > Thanks. >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-202

2017-09-19 Thread Richard Yu
It is not possible, more than likely we are going to wait until after the release. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > +1 > > But I think we cannot get it into 1.0 as KIP vote deadline passed > already. Or is it possible to get an exception from this? > > > -Matthias > > O

Re: [VOTE] KIP-202

2017-09-19 Thread Matthias J. Sax
+1 But I think we cannot get it into 1.0 as KIP vote deadline passed already. Or is it possible to get an exception from this? -Matthias On 9/19/17 7:09 AM, Richard Yu wrote: > Kip has been changed to suit 1.0.0 release. > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Damian Guy wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On

Re: [VOTE] KIP-202

2017-09-19 Thread Richard Yu
Kip has been changed to suit 1.0.0 release. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Damian Guy wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 at 14:15 Bill Bejeck wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -Bill > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:41 AM, Guozhang Wang > wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, +1. > > > > > > If we can

Re: [VOTE] KIP-202

2017-09-19 Thread Damian Guy
+1 On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 at 14:15 Bill Bejeck wrote: > +1 > > -Bill > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:41 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote: > > > Thanks for the KIP, +1. > > > > If we can make it in 1.0.0, I think we can just remove the merge() in > > StreamsBuilder as it will only be introduced in 1.0.0; if w

Re: [VOTE] KIP-202

2017-09-19 Thread Bill Bejeck
+1 -Bill On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:41 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, +1. > > If we can make it in 1.0.0, I think we can just remove the merge() in > StreamsBuilder as it will only be introduced in 1.0.0; if we will add it in > 1.1.0, then we indeed need to deprecate it. > > > Gu

Re: [VOTE] KIP-202

2017-09-19 Thread Guozhang Wang
Thanks for the KIP, +1. If we can make it in 1.0.0, I think we can just remove the merge() in StreamsBuilder as it will only be introduced in 1.0.0; if we will add it in 1.1.0, then we indeed need to deprecate it. Guozhang On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Richard Yu wrote: > KIP-202 Move mer

Re: [VOTE] KIP-202

2017-09-18 Thread Richard Yu
KIP-202 Move merge() from StreamsBuilder to KStream. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-202+Move+merge%28%29+from+StreamsBuilder+to+KStream This is the link for the VOTE. On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Richard Yu wrote: > Hello, I would like to start a VOTE thread on KIP-2

[VOTE] KIP-202

2017-09-18 Thread Richard Yu
Hello, I would like to start a VOTE thread on KIP-202. Thanks.