Re: [VOTE] KIP-1036: Extend RecordDeserializationException exception

Hi, We can conclude with +4 binding and +3 non-binding votes. So it's adopted and I will propose it for the 3.8.0 release. Thank you everyone for your help and participation.

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1036: Extend RecordDeserializationException exception

Thanks for the KIP! +1 binding On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 2:44 PM Frédérik Rouleau wrote: > > Hi all, > > I will keep the vote open for a few more hours as I would like to propose > the KIP for the next 3.8.0 release (deadline is the 15th May). > Currently we have +4 binding and +3 non-binding. > T

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1036: Extend RecordDeserializationException exception

Hi all, I will keep the vote open for a few more hours as I would like to propose the KIP for the next 3.8.0 release (deadline is the 15th May). Currently we have +4 binding and +3 non-binding. Thanks,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1036: Extend RecordDeserializationException exception

Thanks! +1 (binding) Best, Bruno On 5/13/24 8:38 PM, Kirk True wrote: +1 (non-binding) Thanks Fred! On May 13, 2024, at 5:46 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote: Thanks for the KIP! +1 (binding) -Bill On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 6:16 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: +1 (binding) thanks for the KIP! On

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1036: Extend RecordDeserializationException exception

+1 (non-binding) Thanks Fred! > On May 13, 2024, at 5:46 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote: > > Thanks for the KIP! > > +1 (binding) > > -Bill > > > On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 6:16 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> thanks for the KIP! >> >> On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 9:13 AM Matthias

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1036: Extend RecordDeserializationException exception

Thanks for the KIP! +1 (binding) -Bill On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 6:16 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: > +1 (binding) > > thanks for the KIP! > > On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 9:13 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On 5/3/24 8:52 AM, Federico Valeri wrote: > > > Hi Fred, this is a usef

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1036: Extend RecordDeserializationException exception

+1 (binding) thanks for the KIP! On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 9:13 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On 5/3/24 8:52 AM, Federico Valeri wrote: > > Hi Fred, this is a useful addition. > > > > +1 non binding > > > > Thanks > > > > On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 4:11 PM Andrew Schofield > > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1036: Extend RecordDeserializationException exception

+1 (binding) On 5/3/24 8:52 AM, Federico Valeri wrote: Hi Fred, this is a useful addition. +1 non binding Thanks On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 4:11 PM Andrew Schofield wrote: Hi Fred, Thanks for the KIP. It’s turned out nice and elegant I think. Definitely a worthwhile improvement. +1 (non-bind

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1036: Extend RecordDeserializationException exception

Hi Fred, this is a useful addition. +1 non binding Thanks On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 4:11 PM Andrew Schofield wrote: > > Hi Fred, > Thanks for the KIP. It’s turned out nice and elegant I think. Definitely a > worthwhile improvement. > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Andrew > > > On 30 Apr 2024, a

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1036: Extend RecordDeserializationException exception

Hi Fred, Thanks for the KIP. It’s turned out nice and elegant I think. Definitely a worthwhile improvement. +1 (non-binding) Thanks, Andrew > On 30 Apr 2024, at 14:02, Frédérik Rouleau > wrote: > > Hi all, > > As there is no more activity for a while on the discuss thread, I think we > can st

[VOTE] KIP-1036: Extend RecordDeserializationException exception

Hi all, As there is no more activity for a while on the discuss thread, I think we can start a vote. The KIP is available on https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1036%3A+Extend+RecordDeserializationException+exception If you have some feedback or suggestions, please participate