Hi all,
Thanks for all the votes. We already have 4 binding votes. I am planning to
close the vote in 24 hours.
Best,
David
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 12:31 PM Luke Chen wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> The system tests link works for me now. Thanks.
> The failed tests are the same as RC3, so it looks good
Hi David,
we ran all the automated regression pipelines by using the Kafka 4.0.0 RC4
binaries within the next planned Strimzi 0.46.0 release (Kafka on
Kubernetes).
Everything seems to be fine so this RC4 looks good to me.
+1 non binding
Thanks for running the release.
Cheers,
Paolo
On Fri, 14 M
Hi David,
The system tests link works for me now. Thanks.
The failed tests are the same as RC3, so it looks good to me.
Thanks.
Luke
On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 10:48 PM 黃竣陽 wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> I've completed the following tests on my local machine:
>
> - Built from source using JDK 21 & JDK
Hi David, I verified the new RC with the following steps:
- Checked system tests run: there were 2 new failures in connect that we
didn't have in the previous RC (test_broker_compatibility and
test_pause_state_persistent). I ran them locally and they both pass (so
based on this and the error msg s
Hi David,
I verified the latest RC with the following steps:
- Verified the signatures
- Built from source
- Ran the unit tests (same single failure from before, but otherwise all
good)
- Executed the quickstart against the built source code.
- Ran the streams quickstart.
- T
Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
This is the fourth candidate for release of Apache Kafka 4.0.0.
- This is the first release without Apache Zookeeper
- The Next Generation of the Consumer Rebalance Protocol is Generally Available
- The Transactions Server-Side Defense (Phase 2
Hello David,
I've completed the following tests on my local machine:
- Built from source using JDK 21 & JDK 17 (Zulu, Amazon, Eclipse) in docker
container
- Executed all unit and integration tests
- Ran the quickstart successfully
- test console consumer and producer
- Tested dynamic voter with
Hi Luke,
The link works for me. Have you tried from a different browser or a
different device?
Best,
David
Le sam. 15 mars 2025 à 10:42, Luke Chen a écrit :
> Hi David,
>
> For the system tests:
> > System tests:
>
> https://confluent-open-source-kafka-branch-builder-system-test-results.s3-us-
Hi David,
For the system tests:
> System tests:
https://confluent-open-source-kafka-branch-builder-system-test-results.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/trunk/2025-03-13--001.6a14e68a-4791-44eb-a6be-24ce25bc1678--1741882266--apache--4.0--8f765a1886/report.html
This page is blank in my browser. Is that o
Hi David,
>From @Jusine
> I was able to run the tests I wanted and I found when I use the upgrade
--release version flag, we are still saying we are upgrading kraft.version
to 1 even though we do not. I don't think this is necessarily a blocker,
but wanted to call it out.
I've opened KAFKA-18992
Hi David,
I have done the following tests:
- Built from 4.0.0-rc4 with JDK21-zulu/JDK21-amzn and ran all unit and
integration tests in a container
- a few tests failed at the first attempt, but failed tests passed
after retried
- Ran all system tests
- The network_degrade_test and replica
notes
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Andrew
From: Bill Bejeck
Sent: 14 March 2025 16:22
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.0.0 RC4
Hi David,
I verified the latest RC with the following steps:
- Verified the signatures
- Built from source
Hello again folks,
I chatted with Jose offline about this issue and he explained we need to
remove the --standalone flag to get kraft.version=0. I filed a ticket for
this here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18987
I was able to run the tests I wanted and I found when I use the upgrad
Hi David,
Thanks for this next release candidate.
Maybe I'm missing something, but I was trying to test out some of the
changes that Jose provided, by configuring a static quorum
(kraft.version=0) and I seem to be unable to do so.
I set controller.quorum.voters=1@localhost:9093 as per how it look
David, thanks for running this behemoth of a release.
With the help of my coworker Mahsa Seifikar, we have verified the following
upgrade scenario:
* Provision a ZK based Kafka cluster on 3.5 and create some topics
* Upgrade to 3.9
* Migrate to KRaft
* Upgrade to 4.0
We found a few docs issues w
Hi David, I've tested the RC4 and this is what I've done:
- Used the binaries to create a cluster and run clients from exampled module
- Tested the upgrade issue we found in KAFKA-18979
- Tested the dynamic quorum feature (both scale up and down)
- Tested group.protocol=consumer with a simple Java
16 matches
Mail list logo