Hi Jun,
Thanks. I have cherry-picked
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18864 to 4.0.
Best,
David
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 3:18 PM David Jacot wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have opened https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/19080 for Kirk's
> logging observation.
>
> Best,
> David
>
> On Mon, Ma
Hi all,
I have opened https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/19080 for Kirk's logging
observation.
Best,
David
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 12:22 PM David Jacot wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Please go ahead and cherry-pick it to 4.0.
>
> Best,
> David
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 10:12 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Please go ahead and cherry-pick it to 4.0.
Best,
David
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 10:12 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> we found an issue with Kafka Streams that definitely is a regression. A
> commit fixed a leak, introduced a bug that prevented Kafka Streams from
> re-initiali
Hi David,
we found an issue with Kafka Streams that definitely is a regression. A
commit fixed a leak, introduced a bug that prevented Kafka Streams from
re-initializing its transactional producer in case the producer is
fenced. The consequence of not re-initializing the transactional
produce
Given that this is effectively a documentation fix, a cherry-pick makes
sense.
Ismael
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 1:30 PM Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, David,
>
> We just fixed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18864. Not sure
> if you want to cherry-pick it to 4.0.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
> On Thu,
Hi, David,
We just fixed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18864. Not sure
if you want to cherry-pick it to 4.0.
Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 7:22 PM Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks for the testing Kirk. Can you please file an issue for the repeated
> log to make sure it doesn't
Thanks for the testing Kirk. Can you please file an issue for the repeated
log to make sure it doesn't get lost in this thread?
Ismael
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 2:54 PM Kirk True wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I focused on testing the clients using Java 11:
>
> My steps:
>
> 1. Start the broker via the n
Hi David,
I focused on testing the clients using Java 11:
My steps:
1. Start the broker via the native Docker image (apache/kafka-native:4.0.0-rc0)
2. Wrote a simple client to write and read messages, using kafka-clients 4.0.0
from https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging
3. Ran my
hi David
I apologize for not testing the release candidate (RC) as I focused on
reviewing the documentation. I have created tickets to address issues in the
documentation [0][1][2][3], which will be merged into 4.0 as the risk is
minimal.
Please let me know if you have any other options for th
Thanks for the clarification Jose. Makes sense.
Ismael
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 9:22 AM José Armando García Sancio
wrote:
> Hi Ismael,
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 7:51 AM Ismael Juma wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jose,
> >
> > Is it a low risk change? If not, I would suggest giving it a bit of
> > stabiliz
Hi Ismael,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 7:51 AM Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> Hi Jose,
>
> Is it a low risk change? If not, I would suggest giving it a bit of
> stabilization time before cherry-picking to older branches including 4.0
> and 3.9. I don't think it's necessary to backport to other older branches
Hi Jose,
Is it a low risk change? If not, I would suggest giving it a bit of
stabilization time before cherry-picking to older branches including 4.0
and 3.9. I don't think it's necessary to backport to other older branches
given that it's not a regression and I don't believe there are any cases o
docs.
I haven't created an issue at this point because I'm not sure whether others
will agree.
Thanks,
Andrew
From: Ismael Juma
Sent: 26 February 2025 00:08
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.0.0 RC0
Hi Jun,
When it comes to t
Hi Jun,
When it comes to the upgrade documentation, a couple of changes landed
after the RC was generated:
*
https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/da8f390c4599d7199c4cdf2bb85441146e859b17
*
https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/da3b8e88dc61a1b749895866394cab68410e0eda
Regarding the message for
Hi, David,
Thanks for preparing RC0.
A few comments on the documentation.
1.5 Upgrading
There is no documentation on which previous releases can be upgraded to 4.0.
5.3.3 Old Message Format
Should we remove this section since 4.0 only supports the V2 message format?
6.10 Consumer Rebalance Pro
Hi David and all,
I am about to merge https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18852 to
trunk: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18723. I would like
to cherry-pick it to 4.0.0. What do you think?
I will also be cherry picking the change back to 3.7.x, 3.8.x and
3.9.x. If it is not included
Hello David,
I've completed the following tests on my local machine:
- Built from source using JDK 21 & JDK 17 (Zulu, Amazon, Eclipse)
- Executed all unit and integration tests
- Ran the quickstart successfully
- Tested dynamic voter with 4.0 and 3.9 controllers
- Tested 4.0 controller with a 3.9
+1
On 2025/02/24 23:07:12 Christopher Shannon wrote:
> If the purpose of this is not to vote but just to evaluate the RC then I
> think it would be better to not use the [VOTE] tag for the subject as that
> is super confusing.
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:45 AM Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> > Hi Mic
If the purpose of this is not to vote but just to evaluate the RC then I
think it would be better to not use the [VOTE] tag for the subject as that
is super confusing.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:45 AM Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi Mickael,
>
> This was addressed in the original message:
>
> "This is t
Hi Mickael,
This was addressed in the original message:
"This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka 4.0.0. We
still have some remaining blockers but we figured that getting a first
release candidate will help the community to test this major release."
There are a large number of cha
Hi David,
I see we still have a few open Jiras marked as blockers for 4.0.0:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=325421614#ReleasePlan4.0.0-OpenIssues
Are we expecting another RC soon? Or can this vote pass and these
Jiras are moved to 4.1.0?
Thanks,
Mickael
On Sun,
Thanks David! A few ideas of things to test:
1. Test clients and streams with Java 11: this is the first time we use a
different Java version for clients/streams vs the rest, so it would be good
to ensure the generated artifacts are good when it comes to this.
2. Similarly, test brokers and connec
Hi David,
So far, I have completed the following validations on my local machine:
- Built from source with JDK21-Zulu
- Ran all unit and integration tests
- Ran the KRaft quickstart using kafka_2.13-4.0.0.tgz
- Built JVM/native images with RC archive
- Tested JVM/native containers by following th
Hi all,
The native image has been published:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/actions/runs/13471585477/job/37646356143.
I thought that the job was stuck but it just took longer than what I
expected. Sorry for the confusion.
Best,
David
On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 12:10 PM TengYao Chi wrote:
>
> Hi D
Hi David,
Thanks for running the 4.0 release!
apache/kafka-native:4.0.0-rc0 (Building the native image failed, I need to
> investigate it)
I have just tried to build 4.0 native images on my local machine and it
worked normally.
(command: `python3 docker_build_test.py kafka/test --image-tag kafka
Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka 4.0.0. We
still have some remaining blockers but we figured that getting a first
release candidate will help the community to test this major release.
- This is the first release without A
26 matches
Mail list logo
