Closing this vote, please refer to the [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC1 thread
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:41 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Can you clarify a few things?
>
> Sorry I'm not subscribed to this list and only just saw this.
>
> > - On the first point, the only thing I see is zstd, which we do no
Hi,
> Can you clarify a few things?
Sorry I'm not subscribed to this list and only just saw this.
> - On the first point, the only thing I see is zstd, which we do not, in
> fact, ship the library itself, just the jni bindings. Was there anything
> else you saw?
In the source release you are no
release.
>
> Kind regards
> Georg
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sophie Blee-Goldman
> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 11:44 PM
> To: Bruno Cadonna
> Cc: dev ; us...@kafka.apache.org;
> kafka-clie...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC0
&g
Hi Justin,
Thanks for bringing this up and for your advice in resolving
it. I've carved out the specific chunk of work relating to
copyright, and wanted to call your attention to a specific
proposal I have to fix this situation:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12593?focusedCommentId=17
] [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC0
Thanks Bruno. I agree this qualifies as a blocker since it was a regression in
2.6 and may result in data loss. I'll roll a new RC with the fix
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:03 AM 'Bruno Cadonna' via kafka-clients <
kafka-clie...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Hi S
HI,
> - On the first point, the only thing I see is zstd, which we do not, in
> fact, ship the library itself, just the jni bindings. Was there anything
> else you saw?
As far as I can see all of the software mentioned is not in the source release
so shouldn't be mentioned in LICENSE, but I'm no
Hey Justin,
Can you clarify a few things?
- On the first point, the only thing I see is zstd, which we do not, in
fact, ship the library itself, just the jni bindings. Was there anything
else you saw?
- On the second point, I checked the src download from the RC and afaict we
use this header and
Hi,
I was taking a look at this release candidate and noticed a number of things
from a licensing compliance point of view the set a little odd. Now there may
be some history here that I'm unaware of and a good reason why things are like
this. I can see:
- The LICENSE files include things that
Thanks Bruno. I agree this qualifies as a blocker since it was a regression
in 2.6 and
may result in data loss. I'll roll a new RC with the fix
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:03 AM 'Bruno Cadonna' via kafka-clients <
kafka-clie...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Hi Sophie,
>
> Correction to my last e-mail:
Hi Sophie,
Correction to my last e-mail: The bug does not break eos, but it breaks
at-least-once.
Bruno
On 19.03.21 14:54, Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi Sophie,
Please have a look at the following bug report:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12508
I set its priority to blocker since
Hi Sophie,
Please have a look at the following bug report:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12508
I set its priority to blocker since the bug might break at-least-once
and exactly-once processing guarantees.
Feel free to set it back to major, if you think that it is not a blocker.
Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka 2.6.2.
Apache Kafka 2.6.2 is a bugfix release and fixes 30 issues since the 2.6.1
release. Please see the release notes for more information.
Release notes for the 2.6.2 release:
https://
12 matches
Mail list logo
