Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC1

2016-03-31 Thread Becket Qin
I am not sure about the other KIPs, For KIP-33 and KIP-47 I think it is enough if we have reasonable review iterations. On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote: > Good question :) > > Lets say we want: > KIP-43, KIP-35, KIP-4-metadata and KIP-33 to get in. How much time do we > need

Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC1

2016-03-31 Thread Gwen Shapira
Good question :) Lets say we want: KIP-43, KIP-35, KIP-4-metadata and KIP-33 to get in. How much time do we need? I think 2 or 3 weeks is reasonable? Am I being too optimistic again? Gwen On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Becket Qin wrote: > Sure, do we have a new intended release close date

Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC1

2016-03-31 Thread Becket Qin
Sure, do we have a new intended release close date? On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote: > I'd LOVE to have KIP-33 get it. > > Can you work with Jun to make sure the timing will work? > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Becket Qin wrote: > > > Hi Gwen, > > > > KIP-47 is voted

Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC1

2016-03-31 Thread Gwen Shapira
I'd LOVE to have KIP-33 get it. Can you work with Jun to make sure the timing will work? On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Becket Qin wrote: > Hi Gwen, > > KIP-47 is voted and passed, but not merged yet. It is actually depending on > KIP-33 which is in the voting process. > > I know we discussed

Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC1

2016-03-31 Thread Becket Qin
Hi Gwen, KIP-47 is voted and passed, but not merged yet. It is actually depending on KIP-33 which is in the voting process. I know we discussed on the KIP hangout that we will do KIP-33 post 0.10.0. But since 0.10.0 is delayed, maybe we can include KIP-33 given it is a long-wanted fix by many use

Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC1

2016-03-30 Thread Gwen Shapira
I think we are in agreement here. Note that KIP-47 is already voted and merged AFAIK, so it will be in 0.10.0 either way (actually, it will be nice if someone tries using this feature on a the RC...) Gwen On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Grant Henke wrote: > Below are my thoughts on the releas

Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC1

2016-03-30 Thread Grant Henke
Below are my thoughts on the release features. I don't feel too strongly about it, but I figured I would lay out my current perspective on the 0.10 release. When considering the optimal time to do this major release the considerations I am weighing are: - Compatibility - Are more breakin

Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC1

2016-03-30 Thread Rajini Sivaram
If there is time, we will be very keen on including KIP-43 in the 0.10.0 release. Thanks, Rajini On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Ashish Singh wrote: > If it is possible, I am also in favor of having some time to include a few > more KIPs in 0.10. > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Jason Gu

Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC1

2016-03-30 Thread Ashish Singh
If it is possible, I am also in favor of having some time to include a few more KIPs in 0.10. On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Jason Gustafson wrote: > I think it would be nice to get a resolution on KIP-35 before the release. > We were reluctant to push it through when the timeline was tight (

Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC1

2016-03-30 Thread Jason Gustafson
I think it would be nice to get a resolution on KIP-35 before the release. We were reluctant to push it through when the timeline was tight (because of unclear implications), but if we have more time to consider it, it definitely would feel better not to have the issue hanging. -Jason On Wed, Mar

Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC1

2016-03-30 Thread Gwen Shapira
1. Thank you, Guozhang. We'll roll out a new RC early next week if this is ok? 2. I'm seeing very little community feedback (positive or negative) on the release vote. Would people feel better about the release if we delay it a bit to get some high-priority and really awesome KIPs in? (KIP-35, KIP

Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC1

2016-03-29 Thread Guozhang Wang
Hi Gwen: We found a critical bug in Kafka Streams that heavily impact its performance: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/1163 It has been merged to 0.10.0 branch. Can we roll out another RC? Guozhang On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Dana Powers wrote: > +1 -- verified that all kafk

Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC1

2016-03-28 Thread Dana Powers
+1 -- verified that all kafka-python integration tests now pass On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote: > Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers, > > This is the second candidate for release of Apache Kafka 0.10.0.0. > > This is a major release that includes: > > (1) Ne

[VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC1

2016-03-28 Thread Gwen Shapira
Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers, This is the second candidate for release of Apache Kafka 0.10.0.0. This is a major release that includes: (1) New message format including timestamps (2) client interceptor API (3) Kafka Streams. Since this is a major release, we will give