Hi David,
Thanks for the feedback. They are really helpful.
> Can you clarify a bit more what the difference is between regular topics
> and internal topics (excluding __consumer_offsets and
> __transaction_state)? Reading your last message, if internal topics
> (excluding the two) can be creat
Cheng,
Can you clarify a bit more what the difference is between regular topics
and internal topics (excluding __consumer_offsets and
__transaction_state)? Reading your last message, if internal topics
(excluding the two) can be created, deleted, produced to, consumed from,
added to transactions,
Hi Colin,
Thanks for the comments. I’ve modified the KIP accordingly.
> I think we need to understand which of these limitations we will carry
> forward and which we will not. We also have the option of putting
> limitations just on consumer offsets, but not on other internal topics.
In the
Hi Cheng,
The link from the main KIP page is an "edit link" meaning that it drops you
into the editor for the wiki page. I think the link you meant to use is a
"view link" that will just take you to view the page.
In general I'm not sure what I'm supposed to take away from the large UML
diagr
Cheng, thanks for the KIP!
Can you include some details about how this will work the post-ZK world?
For KafkaAdminClient, will we add a new "internal" field to NewTopic, or
will we reuse the existing "configs" map. One concern with sticking this
new special field in the topic configs is that we c
Hello developers,
I’m proposing KIP-619 to add internal topic creation support.
Kafka and its upstream applications treat internal topics differently from
non-internal topics. For example:
• Kafka handles topic creation response errors differently for internal
topics
• Intern
