Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-817: Fix inconsistency in dynamic application log levels

Hi David, Thanks for picking up this issue. 1. Why does this proposal regard OFF only, not ALL? The reason is simple; As you can see, both of ALL and OFF were excluded in KIP-412. However, ALL level is equivalent to TRACE without a custom logging level. (please refer to this discussion

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-817: Fix inconsistency in dynamic application log levels

Hi Dongjin, Thanks for the KIP. It is not so clear to me why we decided not to support OFF in the first place. I understand that entirely disabling a logger is rare. I find the KIP a bit week at the moment for two reasons: 1) The KIP says that the levels that we use are not fully consistent wit

[DISCUSS] KIP-817: Fix inconsistency in dynamic application log levels

Hi Kafka dev, I would like to start the discussion of KIP-817: Fix inconsistency in dynamic application log levels. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-817%3A+Fix+inconsistency+in+dynamic+application+log+levels This is rather a minor issue, but I found it while working with KIP