Does the progress of the KIP have any news? I think this feature is
reasonable
Guoqiang Shu 于2021年3月9日周二 22:31写道：
>
> Thanks Guozhang for the comments! Again sorry for the very late response.
> We took time to further verify the implementation internally and rebased
> the proposal on top of our
Thanks Guozhang for the comments! Again sorry for the very late response. We
took time to further verify the implementation internally and rebased the
proposal on top of our perceived KIP-500 architecture. Embedded please find
some detailed reply.
On 2020/12/15 05:25:13, Guozhang Wang wrote:
Hello George,
Thanks for submitting this KIP. On the high-level I think I agree that
handling keyed messages is a very complicated issue and maybe we can just
start with the easy scenario that does not involve them. Pushing the burden
to admin users to determine if it is really safe to delete part
Hello,
We write up a KIP based on a straightforward mechanism implemented and tested
in order to solve a practical issue in production.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-694%3A+Support+Reducing+Partitions+for+Topics
Look forward to hearing feedback and suggestions.
Thanks!
