Yeah, we can do that. Not sure what we might want to add there, but makes
sense to keep things flexible. Updated the KIP text to reflect this.
-Ewen
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> Hey Ewen,
>
> Just a quick question. It looks like we're returning a simple array
> cont
Hey Ewen,
Just a quick question. It looks like we're returning a simple array
containing the classnames. Would it make sense to return a set of objects
instead? For example:
[
{ "class": "org.apache.kafka.connect.file.FileStreamSourceConnector"},
{ "class": "org.apache.kafka.connect.file.File
Hi all,
It was pointed out that we've been playing a bit fast and loose with API
additions in Kafka. I think it's worth discussing a lighter weight process
for APIs that are still marked unstable, but for the time being we'll add
KIPs before adjusting these APIs.
To that end, I'd like to discuss
