Thanks for the proposal and the PR request, Valeria.
I've been working with Valeria on this PR, so it's not surprising I'm in
favor of this KIP and improvement so that users can easily mask values with
specific replacement values with the same primitive type.
This proposal has been open for over
вт, 19 мар. 2019 г. в 17:59, Valeria Vasylieva :
> Hi Adam,
>
> Thank you for your response!
> Dear community members, do you have any other thoughts on this KIP? Would
> be great if you share them!
>
> Regards,
>
> Valeria
>
> сб, 16 мар. 2019 г. в 18:16, Adam Bellemare :
>
>> Hi Valeria
>>
>> I
Hi Adam,
Thank you for your response!
Dear community members, do you have any other thoughts on this KIP? Would
be great if you share them!
Regards,
Valeria
сб, 16 мар. 2019 г. в 18:16, Adam Bellemare :
> Hi Valeria
>
> I am thinking that a full map function via configuration is very unlikely
Hi Valeria
I am thinking that a full map function via configuration is very unlikely
to be feasible. At that point, it would be best for the user to create
their own custom transformation.
I think that since your function is indeed just an extension of masking
that it is reasonable as presented.
Hi Adam,
Thank you for your interest. Here is the list of currently supported
transformations in Connect:
https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#connect_transforms.
As I can see, there is no "map" transformation in this list and all other
SMTs do not support functionality described in a KIP.
I ca
Hi Valeria
Thanks for the KIP. I admit my knowledge on Kafka Connect transforms is a
bit rusty, however - Is there any other way to currently achieve this same
functionality outlined in your KIP using existing transforms?
Thanks
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:05 PM Valeria Vasylieva <
valeri
Dear community members,
I would be very grateful if you leave any feedback on this KIP. It will
help me to understand if change is useful or not and to decide on further
actions.
Thank you in advance,
Valeria
пн, 11 мар. 2019 г. в 13:20, Valeria Vasylieva :
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to start a
Hi All,
I would like to start a discussion about adding new functionality to
MaskField SMT. The existing implementation allows to mask out any field
value with the null equivalent of the field type.
I suggest to add a possibility to provide a literal replacement for the
field. This way you can ma
