Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manipulation in Processor API

2018-02-08 Thread Matthias J. Sax
t;>>>>>> I like Bill's idea (pending a better name for the Forwarded). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Bill Bejeck >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manipulation in Processor API

2018-02-07 Thread Guozhang Wang
gt;>>> Hi Matthias, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks for the KIP! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Could we consider taking an approach similar to what was done in > >>>> KIP-182 > >>>&g

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manipulation in Processor API

2018-02-06 Thread Matthias J. Sax
; with regards to overloading? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Meaning we could add a "Forwarded" object (horrible name I know) with >>>>>>> methods withTimestamp, withChildName, and withChildIndex. To handle >>>> the >>>>>&

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manipulation in Processor API

2018-02-05 Thread Guozhang Wang
gt;>>> with regards to overloading? > >>>>> > >>>>> Meaning we could add a "Forwarded" object (horrible name I know) with > >>>>> methods withTimestamp, withChildName, and withChildIndex. To handle > >> the > >&g

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manipulation in Processor API

2018-02-01 Thread Matthias J. Sax
>> exception. >>>>> >>>>> Then we could reduce the overloaded {{forward}} methods from 6 to 2. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Bill >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manipulation in Processor API

2018-02-01 Thread Ted Yu
t; exception. > > >> > > >> Then we could reduce the overloaded {{forward}} methods from 6 to 2. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Bill > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Paolo Patierno > > wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manipulation in Processor API

2018-02-01 Thread Bill Bejeck
ld reduce the overloaded {{forward}} methods from 6 to 2. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Bill > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Paolo Patierno > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Matthias, > >>> > >>&

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manipulation in Processor API

2018-02-01 Thread Matthias J. Sax
estamp "type" in the new message on >>> the wire ? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Paolo. >>> >>> From: Matthias J. Sax >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 2:06 AM >>> To: dev@kafka.apache.org >&

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manipulation in Processor API

2018-02-01 Thread Ted Yu
> > Thanks, > > Paolo. > > ____________ > > From: Matthias J. Sax > > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 2:06 AM > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > Subject: [DISCUSS] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manipulation in Processor API > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manipulation in Processor API

2018-02-01 Thread Bill Bejeck
type" in the new message on > the wire ? > > Thanks, > Paolo. > > From: Matthias J. Sax > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 2:06 AM > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manipulation in Processor API &

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manipulation in Processor API

2018-02-01 Thread Paolo Patierno
Hi Matthias, just a question : what will be the timestamp "type" in the new message on the wire ? Thanks, Paolo. From: Matthias J. Sax Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 2:06 AM To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manip

[DISCUSS] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manipulation in Processor API

2018-01-30 Thread Matthias J. Sax
Hi, I want to propose a new KIP for Kafka Streams that allows timestamp manipulation at Processor API level. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-251%3A+Allow+timestamp+manipulation+in+Processor+API Looking forward to your feedback. -Matthias signature.asc Description: Open