hi Poan
chia_02: what happens if the specific node is nonexistent? Could you please add
the case to the test plan?
chia_03: we have another KIP that exposes the versions through metrics. Could
you please expand the rejected alternatives section regarding the option of
“using metrics”?
Best,
Hi Chia-Ping,
Thanks for the review.
chia_00: Updated the comment of `DescribeFeaturesOptions#nodeId` function.
chia_01: Updated the returned type of `DescribeFeaturesOptions#nodeId` to
`OptionalInt` and changed the default value as `OptionalInt.empty()`.
Thanks,
PoAn
> On Jul 23, 2025, at 2
hi PoAn
thanks for this KIP. Please take a look at following questions.
chia_00:
The behavior of "-1" defined by `DescribeFeaturesOptions#nodeId` is too
detailed. That could obstructs us from tweaking the behavior in the future.
Perhaps we could use "arbitrary controller/broker" instead.
chia
Hey PoAn,
I guess today folks would just have to dig through the logs to figure out
supported versions of each node.
Being able to retrieve feature levels for a specific node seems like a
reasonable addition to the kafka-features tool, thanks for the KIP!
Best,
Alyssa
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 7:2
Hi all,
I would like to manually bump this thread.
If there's no further feedback, I'll start the vote next Monday.
Thanks,
PoAn
On 2025/04/15 14:01:18 PoAn Yang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start a discussion thread on KIP-1160.
>
> It adds node id to DescribeFeaturesOptions, so Admi
Hi all,
I would like to start a discussion thread on KIP-1160.
It adds node id to DescribeFeaturesOptions, so Admin client and kafka-features
have ability to retrieve features from a specific node.
Please take a look and feel free to share any thought.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/5gnX
