vote next week if nobody has any additional input or concerns.
Thanks and best regards,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Welch, Matt
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2024 2:54 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test
Hi all,
After muc
e feedback on that point would be helpful.
Thanks,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Welch, Matt
Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2024 1:38 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test
Hi Federico,
Thanks for your response. I have a
be helpful.
Thanks,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Welch, Matt
Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2024 1:38 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test
Hi Federico,
Thanks for your response. I have a few questions.
> You mean, no exis
has a better description and help output example. The intent for
> > these options is definitely to avoid any breakage of existing producer
> > performance system tests. I've also revised some of the language used for
> > better clarity.
> >
> > 2. I
dated the command
lines to contain the payload-file option.
Thanks,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Federico Valeri
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2024 1:04 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test
Hi Matt, thanks for the updates. Snippets ar
m steady state results, it could be tempting for
> > > users to run very short tests since they no longer need to wait long
> > > to achieve a repeatable steady-state result. I would consider this a
> > > case of insufficient warmup since Kafka could still be processing
>
at feature
and should be described in a future KIP.
Thanks,
Matt
-----Original Message-
From: Federico Valeri
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2024 8:02 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test
Hi Matt, I thanks for the KIP, this is a really
first test, then double
> > that duration for the warmup in subsequent testing. One minute is usually
> > sufficient. A problem does occur when using unlimited throughput since the
> > user does not yet know how fast the producers will send so can't estimate
> &
sufficient. A problem does occur when using unlimited throughput since the
> user does not yet know how fast the producers will send so can't estimate
> warmup records. If the iterative testing described above is not possible to
> estimate a warmup, the user must choose a fairly large n
P
> > numbers,
> but
> > hopefully it's straightened out now.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matt
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Welch, Matt
> > Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 4:44 PM
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
;
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Welch, Matt
> > Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 4:44 PM
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'd
t; Apparently, we encountered a race condition when choosing KIP numbers, but
> hopefully it's straightened out now.
>
> Regards,
> Matt
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Welch, Matt
> Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 4:44 PM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
>
2024 4:44 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test
Hello all,
I'd like to propose a change that would allow the producer performance test to
have a warmup phase where the statistics gathered could be separated from
statistics
Hello all,
I'd like to propose a change that would allow the producer performance test to
have a warmup phase where the statistics gathered could be separated from
statistics gathered during steady state.
Although startup is an important phase of Kafka operations and special
attention should b
14 matches
Mail list logo
