Thanks -- there is a few fixed for Kafka Streams we are considering to
cherry-pick to get into 3.5.2 release -- can you give us a few more days
for this?
-Matthias
On 10/12/23 6:20 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote:
Thanks for volunteering Luke!
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 2:55 AM Levani Kokhreidze
Thanks for volunteering Luke!
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 2:55 AM Levani Kokhreidze
wrote:
> Hi Divij,
>
> Thanks for the explanation, makes sense.
>
> Hi Luke, thanks you! It would be awesome to see 3.5.2 out.
>
> Best,
> Levani
>
> > On 12. Oct 2023, at 12:39, Luke Chen wrote:
> >
> > Hi Levani a
Hi Divij,
Thanks for the explanation, makes sense.
Hi Luke, thanks you! It would be awesome to see 3.5.2 out.
Best,
Levani
> On 12. Oct 2023, at 12:39, Luke Chen wrote:
>
> Hi Levani and Divij,
>
> I can work on the 3.5.2 release.
> I'll start a new thread for volunteering it maybe next week
Hi Levani and Divij,
I can work on the 3.5.2 release.
I'll start a new thread for volunteering it maybe next week.
Thanks.
Luke
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 5:07 PM Divij Vaidya
wrote:
> Hello Levani
>
> From a process perspective, there is no fixed schedule for bug fix
> releases. If we have a vol
Hello Levani
>From a process perspective, there is no fixed schedule for bug fix
releases. If we have a volunteer for release manager (must be a committer),
they can start with the process of bug fix release (with the approval of
PMC).
My personal opinion is that it's too early to start 3.6.1 and
Hello,
KAFKA-15571 [1] was merged and backported to the 3.5 and 3.6 branches. Bug
fixes the feature that was added in 3.5. Considering the feature doesn't work
as expected without a fix, I would like to know if it's reasonable to start the
3.5.2 release. Of course, releasing such a massive proj
