[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-10877) Instantiating loggers for every FetchContext causes low request handler idle pool ratio.

2020-12-21 Thread Sean McCauliff (Jira)
Sean McCauliff created KAFKA-10877: -- Summary: Instantiating loggers for every FetchContext causes low request handler idle pool ratio. Key: KAFKA-10877 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10877

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-8969) Log the partition being made online due to unclean leader election.

2019-10-02 Thread Sean McCauliff (Jira)
Sean McCauliff created KAFKA-8969: - Summary: Log the partition being made online due to unclean leader election. Key: KAFKA-8969 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8969 Project: Kafka

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-5239) Producer buffer pool allocates memory inside a lock.

2017-05-14 Thread Sean McCauliff (JIRA)
Sean McCauliff created KAFKA-5239: - Summary: Producer buffer pool allocates memory inside a lock. Key: KAFKA-5239 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5239 Project: Kafka Issue

[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-4840) There are are still cases where producer buffer pool will not remove waiters.

2017-03-13 Thread Sean McCauliff (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean McCauliff updated KAFKA-4840: -- Description: There are several problems dealing with errors in BufferPool.allocate(int size

[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-4840) There are are still cases where producer buffer pool will not remove waiters.

2017-03-08 Thread Sean McCauliff (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean McCauliff updated KAFKA-4840: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > There are are still cases where producer buffer p

[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-4840) There are are still cases where producer buffer pool will not remove waiters.

2017-03-08 Thread Sean McCauliff (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean McCauliff updated KAFKA-4840: -- Description: In BufferPool.allocate(int size, long maxTimeToBlockMs): If a Throwable other than

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-4840) There are are still cases where producer buffer pool will not remove waiters.

2017-03-03 Thread Sean McCauliff (JIRA)
Sean McCauliff created KAFKA-4840: - Summary: There are are still cases where producer buffer pool will not remove waiters. Key: KAFKA-4840 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4840

Kafka SNAPSHOT artifact repositories.

2016-12-01 Thread Sean McCauliff
Is there an artifact repository where to-be-released versions of Kafka are published? There appears to be one at http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/ , but I'm not seeing anything published there after 0.8.2. Thanks! Sean

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.10.1.1 Plan

2016-12-01 Thread Sean McCauliff
Well I would like KAFKA-4250 (make ProducerRecord and ConsumerRecord extensible) in the 0.10.1 branch if is not a big deal. They are just dumb structs. But they are final so no extensibility is possible. Sean On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Ignacio Solis wrote: > I don't think anybody from Li

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-82 - Add Record Headers

2016-12-01 Thread Sean McCauliff
t; > >> > > > > > >> deployment >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > and 0x57 on yours, and the poor guys >> developing the >> > app >> > >> > don't >> >

Re: any plans to switch to java 8?

2016-11-10 Thread Sean McCauliff
Wait for JDK 9 which is supposed to be 4-5 months from now? Sean On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:23 AM, radai wrote: > with java 7 being EOL'ed for more than a year and a half now (apr 2015, see > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html) i was wondering if > there's an official plan/ti

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-82 - Add Record Headers

2016-11-08 Thread Sean McCauliff
space. Having reasonable names should allow every header user to peacefully coexist. -- Sean McCauliff Staff Software Engineer Kafka smccaul...@linkedin.com linkedin.com/in/sean-mccauliff-b563192 On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Magnus Edenhill wrote: > Hi, > > I'm +1 for adding generic m

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-82 - Add Record Headers

2016-11-08 Thread Sean McCauliff
> None of them will scale like Kafka. Horizontal scaling is still good. > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Sean McCauliff > wrote: > > +1 for String keys. > > > > I've been doing some bechmarking and it seems like the speedup for using > > i

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-82 - Add Record Headers

2016-11-08 Thread Sean McCauliff
ocs.google.com/document/d/1tfT-6SZdnKOLyWGDH82kS30PnUkmgb7nPLdw6p65pAI/edit?usp=sharing -- Sean McCauliff Staff Software Engineer Kafka smccaul...@linkedin.com linkedin.com/in/sean-mccauliff-b563192 On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Michael Pearce wrote: > +1 on this slimmer version of our proposal > > I de

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-82 - Add Record Headers

2016-10-03 Thread Sean McCauliff
3. Seems like this is from a recent commit about implementing KIP-74. Do we need to coordinate these changes with KIP-74? "The serialisation of the [int, bye[]] header set will on the wire using a strict format" bye[] -> byte[] Sean -- Sean McCauliff Staff Software Engineer Kafka