Re: Metrics in new producer

Jay, pretty impressive how you just write a 'quick version' like that :) Not to get off-topic but why didn't you write this in scala? On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Joel Koshy wrote: > I have not had a chance to review the new metrics code and its > features carefully (apart from your write-

Re: producer rewrite

pache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1227>mentioned above. > That will take you to the patch. > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:49 PM, S Ahmed wrote: > > > Sorry I'm new to o/s, how can I look at this patch? > > > > Would it be mirrored here? https://github.com/apache/kaf

Re: producer rewrite

Sorry I'm new to o/s, how can I look at this patch? Would it be mirrored here? https://github.com/apache/kafka On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Jay Kreps wrote: > Cool, I've uploaded a patch and rb here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1227 > > -Jay > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at

Re: [jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-656) Add Quotas to Kafka

This thread might be of some use, it discusses the memory footprint when using metrics: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/metrics-user/T68H70ea1Og On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Swapnil Ghike (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-656?page=com.atlassian.ji

Re: Kafka User Group Meeting Jun. 27

thanks. reference: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njuz0zSBvnc On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Jun Rao wrote: > The link to the video recording of the event is posted in the meetup link ( > http://www.meetup.com/http-kafka > -apache-org/events/125887332/?_af_eid=125887332&a=uc1_vm&_af=event)

Re: Helping out

https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/0.8/core/src/main/scala/kafka/producer/async/DefaultEventHandler.scala#L152 On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:18 PM, S Ahmed wrote: > Jun, > > Looks like the update would happen around here? > > > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:53 PM,

Re: Helping out

Jun, Looks like the update would happen around here? On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Jun Rao wrote: > Sam, > > Interested in taking a look at > KAFKA-959 > ? > > Thanks, > > Jun > > > On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Sam Meder >wrote: > > >

Re: site updates

On the main page http://kafka.apache.org/, is the introduction/quickstart/design reflecting 0.8? On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jay Kreps wrote: > 1. I think it is fine to do a one-off since it won't impact the APIs. It > would be *awesome* to get this work

Re: Helping out

Quotas is a cool idea, is it going to do cross broker communication or it doesn't need to talk to other brokers? On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Jay Kreps wrote: > Hey Sam, > > That's great. I would be happy to act as a point of contact if any > questions come up or you need a reviewer for pa

Re: admin functionality refactoring

I think that is eating too much of your dog food :) On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Jay Kreps wrote: > One thought I had on some of these things was that it is actually kind of > funny that we implement them in zookeeper. Technically we could implement > them in Kafka itself which would mean l

Re: Abou Kafka 0.8 producer throughput test

omes back. > > Thanks, > Neha > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:24 PM, S Ahmed wrote: > > > I see ok, so if you wanted to compare .7 with .8 on the same footing, > then > > you would set it to 0 right? (since 0.7 is fire and forget) > > > > producer.num.a

Re: Abou Kafka 0.8 producer throughput test

, > > Jun > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 6:42 PM, S Ahmed wrote: > > > producer.num.acks=-1 means what sorry? is it that all replica's are > written > > too? > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Neha Narkhede > >wrote: >

Re: Abou Kafka 0.8 producer throughput test

producer.num.acks=-1 means what sorry? is it that all replica's are written too? On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote: > Looks like Jun's email didn't format the output properly. I've published > some preliminary producer throughput performance numbers on our performance > wiki

Re: kafka 0.8 producer throughput

What's the ack for? If it fails, it will try another broker? Can this be disabled or it's a major design change? On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Jun Rao wrote: > The 50MB/s number is for 0.7. We haven't carefully measured the performance > in 0.8 yet. We do expect the throughput that a singl