't compile in my
copy.
Thanks
rama
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 6:24 PM Rama Eshel wrote:
> Hey John
>
> Fork - Yes; That's what I did in my POC, but my colleagues didn't like it
> so much, because of the maintenance burden..
> Contribute - by all means. I was hoping
a. I know
> this feature has been discussed/requested before, and I think it would be a
> great feature, if it can be made general enough. That might be good for you
> as well, since it offers you a way to get off your “fork” in the long term
> and avoid that maintenance burden.
>
&g
ava API. If you're actually using the Scala API, then these
> functions wouldn't do anything useful to you anyway.
>
> I hope that helps,
> -John
>
> On Sun, May 9, 2021, at 21:35, Rama Eshel wrote:
> > Hi John,
> > Thank you for your reply.
> >
u have to import your implicit converter, and you cannot import
> ours.
>
> I hope this helps!
> -John
>
> On Sun, May 9, 2021, at 02:20, Rama Eshel wrote:
> >
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67289232/kafkastreams-scala-replace-functionscompatconversions
> >
&g
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67289232/kafkastreams-scala-replace-functionscompatconversions
I asked this question ~10 days ago, and it now occurs to me that I asked it
in the wrong place. So trying here:
I am using KafkaStreams 2.6.0, scala, in an existing bunch of applications.
I'm devi
