PM, tao xiao wrote:
>>
>> KAFKA-2657 is unresolved so you can safely assume it hasn't been fixed yet.
>>
>>> On Fri, 6 May 2016 at 07:38 Raj Tanneru wrote:
>>>
>>> Yeah it is a duplicate of KAFKA-2657. The question is how to check / know
>>>
this is a duplication. This is the
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2657 that KAKFA-3112 duplicates
> to.
>
>> On Thu, 5 May 2016 at 22:13 Raj Tanneru wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>> Does anyone know if KAFKA-3112 is merged to 0.9.0.1? Is there a pl
Hi All,
Does anyone know if KAFKA-3112 is merged to 0.9.0.1? Is there a place to check
which version has this fix? Jira doesn’t show fix versions.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3112
Thanks,
Raj Tanneru
Information contained in this e-mail message is confidential. This e-mail
