RE: [VOTE] KIP-1040: Improve handling of nullable values in InsertField, ExtractField, and other transformations

2024-06-17 Thread Punsak Incham
nk the vote can be closed and > mark the KIP as approved? > > Thanks, > Mario. > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 8:44 AM Punsak Incham > mailto:pu...@mfec.co.th>> wrote: > > > Thanks! Chris. > > Waiting @Mario Fiore Vitale to close the voting and mark it

RE: [VOTE] KIP-1040: Improve handling of nullable values in InsertField, ExtractField, and other transformations

2024-06-13 Thread Punsak Incham
08b6f67%7C1%7C0%7C63853943730004293 > 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 > Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=mcPQROjQyuK1Z2vDl%2BLVki8AeB > FsnTIkqxaX8FR2LRA%3D&reserved=0) when the change for the KIP was > applied to each SMT. > &g

RE: [VOTE] KIP-1040: Improve handling of nullable values in InsertField, ExtractField, and other transformations

2024-06-13 Thread Punsak Incham
Hi Punsak, > > If nobody has signaled their intent to contribute that work yet (which I > believe is the case), you are welcome to take it on yourself! > > Cheers, > > Cheers > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, 12:52 Punsak Incham wrote: > > > My customers are using the

RE: [VOTE] KIP-1040: Improve handling of nullable values in InsertField, ExtractField, and other transformations

2024-06-13 Thread Punsak Incham
My customers are using these SMTs, I think it can affect to their project (about data correctness) in the future. (You may think why I'm not developing it and send to my customers directly? Because they will use only SMTs that published by Kafka.) On 2024/06/13 16:38:45 Punsak Incham

RE: [VOTE] KIP-1040: Improve handling of nullable values in InsertField, ExtractField, and other transformations

2024-06-13 Thread Punsak Incham
gt; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP! +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 4:22 AM Mario Fiore Vitale < > > > > > > > mvit...@redhat.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-1040 which aims to improve > > > > > > handling > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > nullable values in InsertField, ExtractField, and other > > > > > > > > transformations > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > KIP - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=303794677 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Discussion thread - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ggqqqjbg6ccpz8g6ztyj7oxr80q5184n > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Mario > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario Fiore Vitale > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Senior Software Engineer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> > > > > > > > > > <https://www.redhat.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario Fiore Vitale > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Senior Software Engineer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> > > > > > > > <https://www.redhat.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Mario Fiore Vitale > > > > > > > > Senior Software Engineer > > > > > > > > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> > > > > <https://www.redhat.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Mario Fiore Vitale > > > > Senior Software Engineer > > > > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> > > <https://www.redhat.com/> > > > Punsak Incham Data Platform Engineer (Kafka and Confluent) MFEC

RE: [VOTE] KIP-1040: Improve handling of nullable values in InsertField, ExtractField, and other transformations

2024-06-12 Thread Punsak Incham
Hi all, I have a few questions. If you include all the related SMTs in the KIP, such as MaskField and ValueToKey, As a user, when will I be able to use the updated SMTs? Do all the related SMTs in the KIP need to be fixed first before you release them for users like me to use? Punsak Incham

Subscribe for discussion on Kafka® development

2024-06-12 Thread Punsak Incham
I want to subscribe for discussion on Kafka® development. Best regards, [A black and blue logo Description automatically generated] Punsak Incham (Mon) Data Platform Engineer Data Modernization Tel : +66(0)91-790-1302 | Email : pun...@mfec.co.th<mailto:pun...@mfec.co

RE: Re: [VOTE] KIP-1040: Improve handling of nullable values in InsertField, ExtractField, and other transformations

2024-06-11 Thread Punsak Incham
gt; > > > KIP - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=303794677 > > > > > > > > > > > > Discussion thread - > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ggqqqjbg6ccpz8g6ztyj7oxr80q5184n > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > Mario > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Mario Fiore Vitale > > > > > > > > Senior Software Engineer > > > > > > > > Red Hat https://www.redhat.com/ > > > > https://www.redhat.com/ > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Mario Fiore Vitale > > > > Senior Software Engineer > > > > Red Hat https://www.redhat.com/ > > https://www.redhat.com/ > > > Punsak Incham Data Platform Engineer (Kafka and Confluent) MFEC