ld do natively the things that people use schema registries
> > for today. I'm not convinced that the Kafka Connect data classes are
> > really up to the job, so I'm not sure that there's a lot of value in
> making
> > a separate module. Having said that, it's
Hi all,
Any other feedback on this? I'll take the discussion open for another week
and then start the vote.
Thanks,
Mario.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 10:30 AM Mario Fiore Vitale
wrote:
> Hi Greg, thanks for giving a look.
>
> > It's a closed type system which cannot hav
ore expanding it to non-Connect
> users.
>
> Another way to satisfy the requirements of your KIP would be to adopt an
> existing external data model in Connect. If there was a suitably general
> data model out there, we could promote it within the Connect ecosystem and
> deprecat
Hi all,
I just want to bring the discussion up since it was open during the
Christmas holidays.
Any other considerations?
Thanks,
Mario.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 3:04 PM Mario Fiore Vitale
wrote:
> Hey Hector,
>
> the aim of this KIP is to separate the Connect data (Struct, Schema, e
ect data classes
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I would like to start a discussion on KIP-1122: Create a dedicated data
> module for Kafka Connect data classes [1].
>
> [1]
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1122%3A+Create+a+dedicated
> +data+module+for+Kafka+Connect+data+classes
>
> Regards,
> --
> Mario Fiore Vitale
>
>
>
Hi Everyone,
I would like to start a discussion on KIP-1122: Create a dedicated data
module for Kafka Connect data classes [1].
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1122%3A+Create+a+dedicated+data+module+for+Kafka+Connect+data+classes
Regards,
--
Mario Fiore Vitale
Mario Fiore Vitale created KAFKA-18299:
--
Summary: Promote Kafka Connect data package as a dedicated module
Key: KAFKA-18299
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18299
Project: Kafka
n open PR.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 7:13 AM Nelson B.
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Colin,
> > >>
> > >> If you have time could you please have a look at KIP-1025 and cast
> your
>
an certainly go in 3.9 if we can
> hit the deadlines. If you need an extra day or two just ping me. (But I
> don't want to extend things for too long!) :)
>
> Do we feel that KIP-1040 can make feature freeze?
>
> best,
> Colin
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024, at 01:48, Mario
eally is mostly about the removals and the new JDK
> > (which
> > > > > are
> > > > > >> a big deal, but I hope should fit within the normal timeframes).
> > That
> > > > > being
> > > > > >> said, if people want a shorter 4.0, I'm open to that, as long as
> > we're
> > > > > >> confident we could actually do that :)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> best,
> > > > > >> Colin
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024, at 20:56, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote:
> > > > > >>> +1, thank you Colin
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Given the July freeze deadlines, I take it we are going with
> the
> > "short
> > > > > >>> 3.9.0 release" option and that the existence of this release
> will
> > > > > impact
> > > > > >>> the 4.0.0 deadlines which will still follow the usual schedule
> > -- in
> > > > > >> other
> > > > > >>> words, this is an "additional release" outside of the regular
> > timeline.
> > > > > >> Is
> > > > > >>> this understanding correct?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 5:57 PM Chia-Ping Tsai <
> > chia7...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> +1 thanks Colin!
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -José
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -José
> >
>
--
Mario Fiore Vitale
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>
<https://www.redhat.com/>
Hi All,
We have 4 binding +1 votes. Do you think the vote can be closed and mark
the KIP as approved?
Thanks,
Mario.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 8:44 AM Punsak Incham wrote:
> Thanks! Chris.
> Waiting @Mario Fiore Vitale to close the voting and mark it as approved.
>
> Cheers.
>
lueToKey transformations.
> This looks like just a typo to me, should we update the KIP before closing
> the vote?
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 6:50 AM Mario Fiore Vitale
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > The same check was made
han adding a configuration that nobody needs.
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 9:24 AM Yash Mayya wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 7:40 PM Mario Fiore Vitale
> > wrote:
> >
Hi all,
Just wanted to bump up this thread for visibility.
Thanks!
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 5:31 PM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> Hi Mario,
>
> +1 (binding)
> Thanks for the KIP!
>
> Mickael
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 12:06 PM Mario Fiore Vitale
> wrote:
> >
>
After 7 days I received only one vote. Should I suppose this will not be
approved?
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 4:14 PM Chris Egerton
wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP! +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 4:22 AM Mario Fiore Vitale
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> &g
Hi everyone,
I'd like to call a vote on KIP-1040 which aims to improve handling of
nullable values in InsertField, ExtractField, and other transformations
KIP -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=303794677
Discussion thread -
https://lists.apache.org/thread/ggqqqjbg
Hi all,
Any other suggestions/objections/dubs?
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 5:10 PM Chris Egerton
wrote:
> 👍 Done
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2024, 10:55 Mario Fiore Vitale wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot! I have just a minor comment, should we also update the
> title
> > to be more
ri, May 10, 2024 at 10:26 AM Chris Egerton wrote:
>
> > I can do it :)
> >
> > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 10:02 AM Mario Fiore Vitale
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, I agree. Unfortunately due to the issue of the creation of a new
> >> account for the WIK
/java/org/apache/kafka/connect/transforms/SetSchemaMetadata.java#L174
> > > [4] -
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/2a5efe4a334611fc7c15f76b322482bad0942db0/connect/transforms/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/connect/transforms/TimestampConverter.java#L420
> > &
ad0942db0/connect/transforms/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/connect/transforms/TimestampConverter.java#L420
> [5] -
>
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/f4fdaa702a2e718bdb44b9c5fec254f32a33f0d8/connect/transforms/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/connect/transforms/ReplaceField.j
mpatibility clashes
> > between the newer API that the plugin was written for, and the older API
> > that's provided by the runtime it's running on.
> >
> > Anyway, thanks for humoring me. The KIP looks good to me 👍
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Chris
&g
74f596bc7d35fcea97edcd83244e5d6aee308d2/connect/transforms/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/connect/transforms/InsertField.java#L179-L183
> [3] -
>
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/f74f596bc7d35fcea97edcd83244e5d6aee308d2/connect/api/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/connect/data/Struct.j
81%3A+Value+of+optional+null+field+which+has+default+value
Feedback and suggestions are welcome.
Regards,
Mario.
--
Mario Fiore Vitale
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>
<https://www.redhat.com/>
Mario Fiore Vitale created KAFKA-16041:
--
Summary: Replace Afterburn module with Blackbird
Key: KAFKA-16041
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16041
Project: Kafka
Issue
24 matches
Mail list logo
