Re: [VOTE] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

A last reminder :( On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 1:25 PM Jack Tomy wrote: > Hey contributors, > > Please vote or veto the proposal. > > Please don't ghost. Humble request. > > Thanks > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 7:23 AM Jack Tomy wrote: > >> Bumping up..... &

Re: [VOTE] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

Hey contributors, Please vote or veto the proposal. Please don't ghost. Humble request. Thanks On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 7:23 AM Jack Tomy wrote: > Bumping up. > > On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 9:34 AM Jack Tomy wrote: > >> Hey Ismael, Sagar and everyone, >> >&g

Re: [VOTE] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

Bumping up. On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 9:34 AM Jack Tomy wrote: > Hey Ismael, Sagar and everyone, > > Sorry I seem to have interpreted the thread wrong. Before we go ahead with > the DTO based approach I have few reasons not to go with it. > a. It is not following the pattern w

Re: [VOTE] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

ether that makes sense? Also, checking out the > AdminClient APIs examples provided by Ismael will give you more context. > Let me know what you think. > > Thanks! > Sagar. > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 12:49 PM Jack Tomy wrote: > > > Hey everyone, > > > > As

Re: [VOTE] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

gt; > > > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 11:48 AM Greg Harris > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Jack, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Th

Re: [VOTE] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

each time we need to add parameters. > > Ismael > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 4:53 AM Jack Tomy wrote: > > > Hey Ismael, > > > > Are you suggesting to pass a param like a DTO or you are suggesting to > pass > > the record object? > > > > I would also li

Re: [VOTE] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

r the KIP. The problem outlined here is a great example why we > should be using a record-like structure to pass the parameters to a method > like this. Then we can add more parameters without having to introduce new > methods. Have we considered this option? > > Ismael > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

ave to be tackled at this stage. > > Cheers, > > Chris > > On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 12:43 AM Sagar wrote: > > > Hey jack , > > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > Sagar. > > > > On Sat, 12 Aug 2023 at 8:04 AM, Jack Tomy wrote: > > &

Re: [VOTE] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

Hey everyone, Please consider this as a gentle reminder. On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 5:55 PM Jack Tomy wrote: > Hey everyone. > > I would like to call for a vote on KIP-953: partition method to be > overloaded to accept headers as well. > > KIP : > https://cwiki.apache

[VOTE] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

Hey everyone. I would like to call for a vote on KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well. KIP : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=263424937 Discussion thread : https://lists.apache.org/thread/0f20kvfqkmhdqrwcb8vqgqn80szcrcdd Thanks --

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

Hey everyone I'm closing the discussion as I haven't heard from 3 days. Before I close the thread I would like to thank Sagar and Andrew for their suggestions and feedback. I believe it has helped to improve the KIP. Thank you all. On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 10:26 AM Jack Tomy wrote: &

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

chemes in the past makes me > unlikely to use anything other than the default partitioning scheme. > But I wouldn’t let that dissuade you. > > Thanks, > Andrew > > > On 3 Aug 2023, at 13:43, Jack Tomy wrote: > > > > Hey Andrew, Sagar > > > > Please s

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

Hey Andrew, Sagar Please share your thoughts. Thanks. On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 5:58 PM Jack Tomy wrote: > Hey Andrew, Sagar > > Thanks. I'm travelling so sorry for being brief and getting back late. > > 1. For the first concern, that is moving in a direction of server sid

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

gt; >> no idea how the partition > > >> number was arrived at, so they do not truly understand how the > ordering > > >> was derived. I do think that > > >> perhaps there’s value to being able to influence the partitioning > using > > >> the he

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

Hey Everyone, Please consider this as a gentle reminder. Please have a look at the KIP and share your thoughts. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=263424937 On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 7:28 PM Jack Tomy wrote: > Hey @Sagar > > Thanks again for the review. >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

on't have other comments. Post this, probably someone else who has more > context on Clients can also chime in on this before we can move this to > Voting. > > Thanks! > Sagar. > > > On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 10:09 AM Jack Tomy wrote: > > > Hey @Sagar, > >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

pied > over. That can be removed. > > Thanks! > Sagar. > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 2:48 PM Jack Tomy wrote: > > > Hey Everyone, > > > > Please consider this as a reminder and share your feedback. Thank you. > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/co

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

Hey Everyone, Please consider this as a reminder and share your feedback. Thank you. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=263424937 On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 5:43 PM Jack Tomy wrote: > Hey @Sagar, > > Thank you for the response and feedback. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

before adding a > public API. > > 6) One thing which should also be worth noting down would be what happens > if users override both methods, only one method (new or old) and no methods > (the default behaviour). It would help in understanding the proposal > better. > > Thanks

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

Hey everyone, Not seeing much discussion on the KPI. Might be because it is too obvious 😉. If there are no more comments, I will start the VOTE in the coming days. On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 8:48 PM Jack Tomy wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Please take a look at the KPI below and pro

[DISCUSS] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

Hey everyone, Please take a look at the KPI below and provide your suggestions and feedback. TIA. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=263424937 -- Best Regards *Jack*

Requesting permissions to contribute to Apache Kafka

Hi Team, Please find my wiki ID and Jira ID below. I would like to get access to contribute to Apache Kafka wiki ID : hijker JIRA ID : hijker TIA -- Best Regards *Jack*