Ping...??? :)
anyone interested on this feature? anything I can do before sending a vote?
Notice.. if this is inside the constructor or a at the factor.. that's
an easy change that shouldn't stop any further progress here.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
2017 at 9:51 AM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> It would work out. it's just a matter to find what's easier for users...
>
> a builder would work equally.
>
> I listed the rejected alternative in case the constructor wasn't
> accepted. I don't think it adds complexity
ange
> would just make the API more complex.
>
> Thanks,
> Charly
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
>> I was waiting for more input after my last update.. what should be done
>> now?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Nov
I was waiting for more input after my last update.. what should be done now?
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I have updated KIP-209.
>
>
> Determined the \", \\ and \; meanings
>
> Also introduced the possibility of using $ to translate as sys
ht? If I switch
>> > back and forth between two Kafka versions, they will support slightly
>> > different sets of configuration parameters. It seems saner to simply
>> > ignore configuration parameters that we don't understand, like we do
>> > now.
>> >
&
>
> This will cause a lot of compatibility problems, right? If I switch
> back and forth between two Kafka versions, they will support slightly
> different sets of configuration parameters. It seems saner to simply
> ignore configuration parameters that we don't understand, like we do
> now.
I
ke we do
> now.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
>> >
>> > Also as like many systems it typical to note what the connection string is
>> > for with a prefix eg ‘kafka://‘
>> >
>> > Just makes it obvious when an app has a list of connection strings in
Do I have to do anything here?
I wonder how long I need to wait before proposing the vote.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I had these updates in already... you just changed the names at the
> string.. but it was pretty much the same thing I think... I had taken
valid conversion)
>>>Invalid parameters would throw InvalidArgumentException (with the name of
> the invalid parameter).
>
> Should throw IllegalArgumentException with respective message.
>
> Thanks,
> Satish.
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Clebert Su
param-val1,..
>>
>> >>Invalid conversions would throw InvalidArgumentException (with a
>> description of the invalid conversion)
>> >>Invalid parameters would throw InvalidArgumentException (with the name of
>> the invalid parameter).
>>
>> Sho
etadata updates
> should not be < 0 milliseconds");
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I updated the wiki with the list on the proposed arguments.
> >
> > I also changed it to include a
hanks & Regards
> Jakub
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:30 PM, Clebert Suconic > wrote:
>
>> I would like to start a discussion about KIP-209
>> (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
>> 209+-+Connection+String+Support)
>>
>> T
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> Please update link for Discussion thread and JIRA
sure thing... I was waiting my email to go through the servers... so I
could get the link.
>
> There're two TBD's for Invalid conversion and parameters. Can you fill them
> out ?
will do.. I was
...@mail.gmail.com%3e
this could make the bootstrap of a consumer or producer similar to
what users are already used when connecting into other systems, being
a simple addition to Producer and Consumer, without breaking any
previous client usage.
--
Clebert Suconic
If someone could please add my user clebertsuconic with autorization
to create pages.
I am trying to follow the process lined up here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals
Thanks
ns?
Perhaps I should email the list with a different subject?
I was just following the contributing page saying I should ask permissions
here to create the page with the KIP template.
>
> regards,
> Colin
>
--
Clebert Suconic
> As I said before, a connection string might be a good idea. A URI, no.
Same purpose.. I'm fine with that...
Although I can't start a KIP... again.. (lost the count now).. can
someone add me authorizations to the WIKI Page so I can create the
page and start a proper discussion there?
gresql://localhost/test?user=fred&password=secret&ssl=true"
>
> And then like wise on messaging front, systems like
>
> rabbitmq
> “amqp://myhost?heartbeat=10&connection_timeout=10000”
>
>
> I personally like the suggestion +1.
>
>
> Cheers
> Mike
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Colin McCabe wrote:
> We used URIs as file paths in Hadoop. I think it was a mistake, for a
> few different reasons.
>
> URIs are actually very complex. You probably know about scheme, host,
> and port, but did you know about authority, user-info, query, fragment,
I can start a KIP discussion on this.. or not if you really think this
is against basic rules...
I will need authorization to create the page.. if you could assign me
regardless so I can have it for next time?
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> Just as a facility
;s really needed...I suspect you
> have a reason for wanting this, though.
>
> -Jay
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 6:15 AM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
>> At ActiveMQ and ActiveMQ Artemis, ConnectionFactories have an
>> interesting feature where you can pass parameters through
Ping???
Any thoughts?
Or anyone can help me with write access to the Wiki so I can start a
KIP discussion? my userID is clebert.suco...@gmail.com
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I believe I need write access to the WIKI Page:
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.or
I think this would be useful as a secondary way to configure. If others
> agree then you can write up a KIP and it can be discussed in more detail.
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
>> Maybe I didn't make the message clear enough...
>>
ayDeserializer(), new ByteArrayDeserializer());
I could send a Pull Request for that. The framework I would write
would validate if the parameters are valid or not.
Thanks in advance
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> At ActiveMQ and ActiveMQ Artemis, ConnectionFactori
At ActiveMQ and ActiveMQ Artemis, ConnectionFactories have an
interesting feature where you can pass parameters through an URI.
I was looking at Producer and Consumer APIs, and these two classes are
using a method that I considered old for Artemis resembling HornetQ:
Instead of passing a Properti
25 matches
Mail list logo
