Sorry error:
429 appeared in Kafka 2.4.0, and 848 appeared in 3.7
Paul
From: Brebner, Paul
Date: Tuesday, 17 June 2025 at 12:32 pm
To: Kafka Users , dev
Subject: KIP-429 vs. KIP 848?
EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION when clicking links or attachments
Hi all, time for me to ask a silly
Hi all, time for me to ask a silly question please!
I'm puzzled about the transition from KIP-429
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-429%3A+Kafka+Consumer+Incremental+Rebalance+Protocol
to KIP-848
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-848%3A+The+Next+Generatio
Hi Anana,
Typically in Kafka, it is useful for Consumers to know about the number of
partitions (as the number of consumers must be <= partitions).
So one way for Consumers to find partitions is the KafkaConsumer class using
the partitionsFor(topic) method,
https://kafka.apache.org/40/javadoc/o
Hi all,
We’ve previously done some benchmarking of Kafka ZooKeeper vs KRaft and found
no difference in throughput (which we believed is also what theory predicted,
as ZK/Kraft are only involved in Kafka meta-data operations, not data
workloads).
BUT – latest tests reveal improved producer and
Kafka 3.5.0.
Cheers,
David
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 6:32 PM Brebner, Paul
wrote:
> I have a recent 3 part blog series on Kraft (expanded version of ApacheCon
> 2022 talk):
>
>
>
>
> https://www.instaclustr.com/blog/apache-kafka-kraft-abandons-the-zookeeper-part-1-parti
I have a recent 3 part blog series on Kraft (expanded version of ApacheCon 2022
talk):
https://www.instaclustr.com/blog/apache-kafka-kraft-abandons-the-zookeeper-part-1-partitions-and-data-performance/
https://www.instaclustr.com/blog/apache-kafka-kraft-abandons-the-zookeeper-part-2-partitions-an
