; fewer parameters is usually better...
>
>
> I am not sure why we would want to pass `Function>
> func` into `min()`?
>
>
>
> -Matthias
>
>
>
> On 6/21/21 11:23 AM, Mohan Parthasarathy wrote:
> > Alex,
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 a
also to require a ` > Number>`.
> >
> > I guess these are the two possibilities:
>
> Long sum(Function func)
> Long sum(Function func)
>
> Both should work. "func" can return any subtypes of Number and I don't see
> any advantages w
te, but I see value in implementing them and
simplifying the adoption of
those use cases.
Best regards,
Alexandre
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 10:17 PM Mohan Parthasarathy
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Responses below.
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 9:27 AM Alexandre Brasil <
> alexandre.bra.
Hi Mohan,
I like the idea of adding those methods to the API, but I'd like to make a
suggestion:
Although the most used scenario for min() / max() might possibly be for
numeric values, I think they could also be
useful on other objects like Dates, LocalDates or Strings. Why limit the
API to Numbe
