Congrats Jason.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Michael Noll wrote:
> My compliments, Jason -- well deserved! :-)
>
> -Michael
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Grant Henke wrote:
>
> > Congratulations and thank you for all of your contributions to Apache
> > Kafka Jason!
> >
> > On Wed,
Hey Rajini -
If the quota.type is set to 'user', what happens to unauthenticated
clients? They don't supply a principal, so are they essentially
unthrottled?
This may be a nit, but I prefer 'quota.type' options to be
'authenticated-user' and 'client-id' as opposed to 'client' and 'user'. For
a ne
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15232520#comment-15232520
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-3492:
[~rsivaram] - Feel free to take
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15222349#comment-15222349
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-3492:
Very cool. Jun - are you plannin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15212514#comment-15212514
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-3456:
Accidentally changed the thread titl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-3456:
---
Summary: bihtfbucbcceinvujekclljidcuf (was: In-house KafkaMetric
misreports metrics when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-3456:
---
Summary: In-house KafkaMetric misreports metrics when periodically observed
(was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15203370#comment-15203370
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-3427:
[~junrao] - Certainly, I can patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15174366#comment-15174366
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-3310:
[~junrao] - can you take a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15174090#comment-15174090
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1215:
Thanks Allan. I'll review it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15173223#comment-15173223
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-3310:
[~junrao] - Just making sure,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15173204#comment-15173204
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-3310:
[~junrao] - Let me investigate this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15159491#comment-15159491
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1215:
[~allenxwang] - Is this patch ready
the capability to move large
> amounts of data to the controller, after we are very sure that the default
> policy is well tested and the replica throttling works. If so, then it is
> just a matter of placing the trigger in the controller vs in the tool. But
> I'm skeptical
ment in a running
> cluster. Once we stabilize these changes and feel confident that they work,
> we can push the policy into the controller and have it automatically be
> triggered based on different events.
>
> Thanks,
> Neha
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Aditya Aurad
Hey everyone,
I just created a kip to discuss automated replica reassignment when we lose
a broker in the cluster.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-46%3A+Self+Healing+Kafka
Any feedback is welcome.
Thanks,
Aditya
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15111924#comment-15111924
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-3088:
I personally prefer preserving the
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Grant Henke wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Guozhang Wang
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:43
y make sure the version of Record(Message) and
> > > > > > MemoryRecords(MessageSet) matches.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Currently new clients uses classes in o.a.k.common.record, and
> the
> > > > broker
> > > > > > and old clients uses c
onfigurable now.
> >
> > 61. In this design, it's possible for a log segment to have an empty time
> > index. In the worse case, we may have to scan more than the active
> segment
> > to recover the latest timestamp.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > J
gt; >> > wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> Few suggestions on improving the KIP
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> *If some brokers have rack, and some do not, the algorithm will
> >> thrown
> >> > an
> >
Hey Becket/Anna -
I have a few comments about the KIP.
1. (Minor) Can we rename the KIP? It's currently "Add CreateTime and
LogAppendTime etc..". This is actually the title of the now rejected Option
1.
2. (Minor) Can we rename the proposed option? It isn't really "option 4"
anymore.
3. I'm not c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15049357#comment-15049357
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2966:
I'll work on it since I m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar reassigned KAFKA-2966:
--
Assignee: Aditya Auradkar
> 0.9.0 docs missing upgrade notes regarding replica
Congrats Ewen!
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Congrats Ewen! Welcome onboard.
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Liquan Pei wrote:
>
> > Congrats, Ewen!
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Neha Narkhede
> wrote:
> >
> > > I am pleased to announce th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15036359#comment-15036359
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2310:
[~abiletskyi] - I see you submitt
tools are TopicCommand and
> ReassignPartitionsCommand.
>
> Thanks,
> Allen
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Aditya Auradkar
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Allen,
> >
> > For TopicMetadataResponse to understand version, you can bump up the
> &
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14980712#comment-14980712
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2502:
[~gwenshap] - Published a patch. Pl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14979155#comment-14979155
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2502:
[~gwenshap][~ijuma] - Sorry for
Aditya Auradkar created KAFKA-2699:
--
Summary: Add test to validate times in RequestMetrics
Key: KAFKA-2699
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2699
Project: Kafka
Issue Type
> We allow dynamic topic creation with incomplete broker-rack mapping and
> fail fast in command line. Another option is to let user determine the
> behavior for command line. For example, by default fail fast in command
> line but allow incomplete broker-rack mapping if
+1 (non-binding).
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>
> > Thanks everyone for the feedback so far. At this point, I'd like to start
> > a vote for KIP-38.
> >
> > Summary: Add support for ZooKeeper
Hi Abhishek -
Perhaps it would help if you explained the motivation behind your proposal.
I know there was a bunch of discussion on KAFKA-1778, can you summarize?
Currently, I'd agree with Neha and Jay that there isn't really a strong
reason to pin the controller to a given broker or restricted to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar reassigned KAFKA-2664:
--
Assignee: Aditya Auradkar (was: Onur Karaman)
> Adding a new metric with several
pture detailed timing of a random sample of the requests and log it
> > (i.e sample metrics rather than avgs). Note that clients that send more
> > requests and longer requests are more likely to get sampled. I've found
> > this super useful in the past.
> >
> > Gw
t; >> > > >
> >> > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Allen Wang
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > I attended Tuesday's KIP hangout but this KIP was not discussed
> >> due
> >> > to
&
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963909#comment-14963909
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2502:
Thanks Gwen and Ismael. I'll ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963605#comment-14963605
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2502:
[~ijuma] - I assume I need to su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14960132#comment-14960132
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2419:
[~junrao] - Submitted a pull req
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar reopened KAFKA-2419:
> Allow certain Sensors to be garbage collected after inactiv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14959588#comment-14959588
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2419:
I agree it would be nice to not ne
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14959484#comment-14959484
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2419:
[~junrao] - That is indeed the cur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14959409#comment-14959409
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2419:
[~junrao] - I concur that option
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14959409#comment-14959409
]
Aditya Auradkar edited comment on KAFKA-2419 at 10/15/15 6:5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14958962#comment-14958962
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2419:
[~ijuma] - We create only a si
Hey everyone,
We were recently discussing a small logging improvement for Kafka.
Basically, add a request log for queries that took longer than a certain
configurable time to execute. This can be quite useful for debugging
purposes, in fact it would have proven handy while investigating a recent
i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14955720#comment-14955720
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2527:
[~gwenshap] - Thanks!
> System T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14955375#comment-14955375
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2536:
[~gwenshap] - Thanks for reporting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar resolved KAFKA-2606.
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate of: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2247
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-2247:
---
Description:
We currently have 2 different versions of Time in clients and core. These need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14941984#comment-14941984
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2606:
[~ijuma] This is a duplicate of h
ion about the physical location
> > of servers. I don't relish the idea of having to maintain data in
> multiple
> > places.
> >
> > -Todd
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Aditya Auradkar <
> > aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:
Thanks for starting this KIP Allen.
I agree with Gwen that having a RackLocator class that is pluggable seems
to be too complex. The KIP refers to potentially non-ZK storage for the
rack info which I don't think is necessary.
Perhaps we can persist this info in zk under /brokers/ids/
similar to o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14908460#comment-14908460
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1215:
[~allenxwang] - bump.
> Rac
Basically, 0.8.3 has been renamed to 0.9.0. The plan is to include security
in the 0.9 release which should happen once all the blocker bugs have been
resolved and testing is complete (committers can provide more accurate
timelines).
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Whitney, Adam
wrote:
> Hello
+1
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Todd Palino wrote:
>
> > +1000
> >
> > !
> >
> > -Todd
> >
> > On Wednesday, September 23, 2015, Jiangjie Qin >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for the reviews and feedback on K
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14903101#comment-14903101
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2567:
[~junrao] - I'l fix this i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar reassigned KAFKA-2567:
--
Assignee: Aditya Auradkar
> throttle-time shouldn'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-2567:
---
Labels: quotas (was: )
> throttle-time shouldn'
Congrats Sriharsha! Great work.. especially on SSL.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Prabhjot Bharaj
wrote:
> Congratulations. It's inspiring for newbies like me
>
> Regards,
> Prabhjot
> On Sep 22, 2015 10:30 AM, "Ashish Singh" wrote:
>
> > Congrats Harsha!
> >
> > On Monday, September 21, 20
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14901142#comment-14901142
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1599:
[~anigam] - Perhaps you can writ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14745803#comment-14745803
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1215:
[~allenxwang] One of the committers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-2443:
---
Summary: Expose windowSize on Rate (was: Expose windowSize on Measurable)
> Exp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-2443:
---
Description:
Currently, we dont have a means to measure the size of the metric window since
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14739899#comment-14739899
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2528:
One possible explanation for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14739438#comment-14739438
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2528:
I'm not quite sure why the ac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14739324#comment-14739324
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2419:
Thanks [~ijuma] I'll take a l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14739003#comment-14739003
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2500:
[~hachikuji] - Are you plannin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14737918#comment-14737918
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1215:
[~allenxwang] Hi Allen. Thanks for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14737756#comment-14737756
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2419:
[~junrao][~jjkoshy] We have a coupl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14737497#comment-14737497
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2419:
[~junrao] I'm working on this n
+1 on 0.9
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Edward Ribeiro
wrote:
> +1 on 0.9.0
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Ashish Singh wrote:
>
> > +1 on 0.9.0
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> >
> > > I propose a simple rename: s/0.8.3/0.9.0/
> > >
> > > No change of sco
Hi Gwen,
I certainly think 0.9.0 is better than 0.8.3.
As regards semantic versioning, do we have a plan for a 1.0 release? IIUC,
compatibility rules don't really apply for pre-1.0 stuff. I'd argue that
Kafka already qualifies for 1.x.
Aditya
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-2209:
---
Labels: quotas (was: )
> Change client quotas dynamically using DynamicConfigMana
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-2443:
---
Labels: quotas (was: )
> Expose windowSize on Measura
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-2502:
---
Labels: quotas (was: )
> Quotas documentation for 0.
Aditya Auradkar created KAFKA-2502:
--
Summary: Quotas documentation for 0.8.3
Key: KAFKA-2502
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2502
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar resolved KAFKA-2136.
Resolution: Fixed
> Client side protocol changes to return quota del
I thought this would be of interest:
https://developer.zendesk.com/blog/introducing-maxwell-a-mysql-to-kafka-binlog-processor
A copycat connector that parses MySQL binlogs would be rather useful I
think. Streaming connectors using jdbc are tricky to implement because they
rely on an indexed timest
Correct.
Aditya
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Jaikiran Pai
wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 September 2015 09:51 AM, Aditya Auradkar wrote:
>
>> createTopic should also be fine unless you try to create the same topic
>> concurrently.
>>
>
> Just to be clear - that would
Typically to discuss anything listed here or other important changes:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:28 AM, jinxing wrote:
> Can I know what is KIP meeting?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 2015-09-01 12:30:18, "Jun Rao" wrote:
> >Since th
topicExists simply reads ZK, so yes. createTopic should also be fine unless
you try to create the same topic concurrently. AdminUtils itself does not
maintain any state, just some static util functions.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Sivananda Reddys Thummala Abbigari <
sthumm...@salesforce.com>
kafka/server/ThrottledResponseExpirationTest.scala
c4b5803917e700965677d53624f1460c1a52bf52
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33378/diff/
Testing
---
New tests added
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
it/kafka/server/ThrottledResponseExpirationTest.scala
c4b5803917e700965677d53624f1460c1a52bf52
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33378/diff/
Testing
---
New tests added
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
ly need a versionId as well (as is done in the Scala
> > response) - i.e., when we move the broker over to use these protocol
> > schemas.
>
> Aditya Auradkar wrote:
> Makes sense. Do you want me to tackle this in this patch or should it be
> tackled in the patch that
igrates the broker to use these schemas?
- Aditya
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33378/#review96100
---
kafka/server/ThrottledResponseExpirationTest.scala
c4b5803917e700965677d53624f1460c1a52bf52
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33378/diff/
Testing
---
New tests added
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
ationTest.scala
c4b5803917e700965677d53624f1460c1a52bf52
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33378/diff/
Testing
---
New tests added
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
kafka/server/ThrottledResponseExpirationTest.scala
c4b5803917e700965677d53624f1460c1a52bf52
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33378/diff/
Testing
---
New tests added
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
4f1460c1a52bf52
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33378/diff/
Testing
---
New tests added
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
009
---
On Aug. 18, 2015, 8:24 p.m., Aditya Auradkar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33378/
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14707492#comment-14707492
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2442:
[~jjkoshy] - Can you take a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar reassigned KAFKA-2442:
--
Assignee: Aditya Auradkar (was: Dong Lin)
> QuotasTest should not fail when cpu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14704037#comment-14704037
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2446:
[~junrao][~jjkoshy] - Can one of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar resolved KAFKA-2293.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to trunk
> IllegalFormatConversionException in Partition.sc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar resolved KAFKA-2097.
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved in KAFKA-2084
> Implement request delays for quota violati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar resolved KAFKA-2085.
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved in KAFKA-2084
> Return delay time in QuotaViolationExcept
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on KAFKA-2097 started by Aditya Auradkar.
--
> Implement request delays for quota violati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14703701#comment-14703701
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2084:
[~guozhang] Will do
> byte rate
Aditya Auradkar created KAFKA-2446:
--
Summary: KAFKA-2205 causes existing Topic config changes to be lost
Key: KAFKA-2446
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2446
Project: Kafka
1 - 100 of 463 matches
Mail list logo
