[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chia-Ping Tsai resolved KAFKA-17451.
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
> Remove deprecated Consumer#committed
> ---
Chia-Ping Tsai created KAFKA-17689:
--
Summary: Migrate TieredStorageTestHarness to new test infra
Key: KAFKA-17689
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17689
Project: Kafka
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chia-Ping Tsai resolved KAFKA-17511.
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
> Move ElectLeadersRequestOps to ElectLeader
Chia-Ping Tsai created KAFKA-17688:
--
Summary: Move TransactionsTest to storage module
Key: KAFKA-17688
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17688
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Sub-t
Chia-Ping Tsai created KAFKA-17687:
--
Summary: Remove the core.test from storage module's dependency
Key: KAFKA-17687
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17687
Project: Kafka
Iss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chia-Ping Tsai resolved KAFKA-17285.
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
> Consider using `Utils.closeQuietly` to rep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chia-Ping Tsai resolved KAFKA-17589.
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0
Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai (was: David Arthur)
Resoluti
Kirk True created KAFKA-17686:
-
Summary: PlaintextAdminIntegrationTest’s
testOffsetsForTimesAfterDeleteRecords fails with NPE with new consumer
Key: KAFKA-17686
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17686
Hi all
I would like to call a vote for KIP-1094. Please take a moment to review
the proposal and submit your vote.
KIP:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1094%3A+Add+a+new+constructor+method+with+nextOffsets+to+ConsumerRecords
Thanks,
Alieh
Hi all
Regarding the second point that Kirk raised, we should always follow the
"later write wins" policy (as he stated and confirmed). BTW, we can discuss
such details in the PR, I assume.
Since everything is clear and there is no further discussion, we can move
to the voting phase.
Thanks,
Ali
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthias J. Sax resolved KAFKA-17408.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
Seem the root cause if the issue is some ZK connectivity issue. Gi
Chia-Ping Tsai created KAFKA-17685:
--
Summary: make sure all modules have consistent testRuntimeOnly
dependencies
Key: KAFKA-17685
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17685
Project: Kafka
David Arthur created KAFKA-17684:
Summary: Run tests on Java 11 and Java 21
Key: KAFKA-17684
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17684
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Sub-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chia-Ping Tsai resolved KAFKA-16974.
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
> KRaft support in SslAdminIntegrationTest
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chia-Ping Tsai resolved KAFKA-17258.
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
> Migrate AdminFenceProducersIntegrationTest
+1 non binding
Thanks
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 3:03 PM Chris Egerton wrote:
>
> +1 (binding), thanks for the KIP!
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2024, 06:47 Viktor Somogyi-Vass
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks for this improvement. If you have a PR, you can ping me for review.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sushant Mahajan reopened KAFKA-17469:
-
need to move the classes to separate package
> Move appropriate classes and interfaces to t
Hi David,
Thanks for your replies.
DJ2: OK.
DJ3: I've added AdminClient.describeClassicGroups to the KIP. I added
ClassicGroupDescription and ClassicGroupState too. I did consider using
GroupState directly, but all of the other XXXGroupDescription have
their own specific XXXGroupState so I went f
Colin McCabe created KAFKA-17683:
Summary: Remove ZK from Kafka READMEs in 4.0
Key: KAFKA-17683
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17683
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Sub-task
Thanks David,
I would be perfectly fine having:
- Level 2: Experimental (draft and unstable might be too scary)
- Level 3: Preview
- Level 4: Production Ready
PS: I know this is not how KIPs are usually discussed, but names are really
special and this is something I feel the community needs to
I'm not sure why, but for some reason I cannot keep Preview and Early
Access straight. I always mix them up.
"Early Access" -- you are getting access to something early
"Preview" -- you are viewing something in advance
To me, semantically, these terms are just too similar. I would prefer the
Lev
Chia-Ping Tsai created KAFKA-17682:
--
Summary: Refactor RaftClusterInvocationContext to eliminate
test-common-api dependencies
Key: KAFKA-17682
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17682
P
Chia-Ping Tsai created KAFKA-17681:
--
Summary: Fix unstable consumer_test.py#test_fencing_static_consumer
Key: KAFKA-17681
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17681
Project: Kafka
David Arthur created KAFKA-17680:
Summary: StandbyTaskEOSMultiRebalanceIntegrationTest caused build
failure
Key: KAFKA-17680
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17680
Project: Kafka
+1 (binding), thanks for the KIP!
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024, 06:47 Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for this improvement. If you have a PR, you can ping me for review.
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 4:07 PM Dániel Urbán
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I would like to start a vote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Arthur resolved KAFKA-17673.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17336
> Gradle Build Scan PR
Hello everyone,
It seems we have reached a consensus on how this KIP will proceed.
I have updated the content accordingly.
Please take a look, and if there are no further questions, I will initiate
a vote.
Best regards,
TengYao
Chia-Ping Tsai 於 2024年10月2日 週三 上午7:06寫道:
> hi Matthias
>
> Thanks
+1 (binding)
Thanks for this improvement. If you have a PR, you can ping me for review.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 4:07 PM Dániel Urbán wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to start a vote on KIP-1089: Allow disabling heartbeats
> replication in MirrorSourceConnector (
>
> https://cwiki.apache.o
Hey, sorry for dropping the ball on this. Your reasoning makes sense, I'll
go over to the vote thread now, :)
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 9:03 AM Dániel Urbán wrote:
> Bump - I'll start a vote soon if there are no further comments.
> Daniel
>
> Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2024. szept. 19.,
> Cs
Hi Josep,
Thanks for applying the first coat of paint 🙂
Personally, I think the names you propose are good choices. We have precedent
already and the sequence is pretty clear
based on the names themselves.
Thanks,
Andrew
From: Josep Prat
Sent: 02 Octobe
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-17679:
--
Summary: Remove kafka.security.authorizer.AclAuthorizer from
AclCommand
Key: KAFKA-17679
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17679
Project: Kafka
Hi all,
I think the discussion regarding the steps has winded down and we've
reached a good enough consensus. With that out of the way, we can now start
to paint our bike shed, a.k.a. choose the names for each phase.
As we mentioned, step number 1 is virtual and doesn't really need a name.
Step 2'
Francois Visconte created KAFKA-17678:
-
Summary: Problematic new HWM increment behaviour introduced by
KIP-207 and KIP-966
Key: KAFKA-17678
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17678
P
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your replies.
DJ1: Thanks for clarifying. Somehow, I was sure that the tool would at
minimum list those groups.
DJ2: Oh, I see. Actually, removing it would break the admin client as
listConsumerGroups rely on it to filter groups. I think that we should just
keep it as it is
34 matches
Mail list logo