[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luke Chen resolved KAFKA-13917.
---
Fix Version/s: 3.3.0
Resolution: Fixed
> Avoid calling lookupCoordinator() in tight loop
> --
David Jacot created KAFKA-13975:
---
Summary: Mechanism to gate advertised APIs/versions based on
MetadataVersion
Key: KAFKA-13975
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13975
Project: Kafka
Hi there. Thanks for the proposal
+1 binding
> On Jun 9, 2022, at 21:04, Luke Chen wrote:
>
> Bump this thread.
>
> So far, I've got:
> 4 +1 (non-bingin) from Ziming, Divij, James, Raman
> 1 +1 (binding) from Tom Bentley
>
> Thanks for people who vote for this KIP.
> Any other votes/comments a
Bump this thread.
So far, I've got:
4 +1 (non-bingin) from Ziming, Divij, James, Raman
1 +1 (binding) from Tom Bentley
Thanks for people who vote for this KIP.
Any other votes/comments are welcomed?
Thank you.
Luke
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:55 PM Tom Bentley wrote:
> Hi Luke,
>
> Thanks for
showuon merged PR #416:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/416
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.
David Jacot created KAFKA-13974:
---
Summary: Rename `INVALID_UPDATE_VERSION` to
`INVALID_PARTITION_EPOCH`
Key: KAFKA-13974
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13974
Project: Kafka
I
Hi Alexandre,
+1 (binding) from me.
Thank you.
Luke
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 10:24 AM John Roesler wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP, Alexandre!
>
> I’m +1 (binding)
>
> -John
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2022, at 20:54, deng ziming wrote:
> > Thank you for this KIP,
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > --
> > Best
Hi Alexandre,
Thanks for the update.
It looks better and clear now.
I'll vote for it later.
Thank you for this improvement!
Luke
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:33 PM Alexandre Garnier wrote:
> Hi Luke,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> 1. Usually, in "Proposed Changes" section, we won't put PR link
Hi Luke,
Thanks for the feedback.
1. Usually, in "Proposed Changes" section, we won't put PR link there.
> Maybe you can take KIP-824 as a reference.
>
I don't know what to add more here than "Add the new option", it's a really
simple straightforward modification.
2. Also, it'd be better you can
