Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.1.0 release

Hi Chris, Sure thing. I have added KIP-618 to the release plan. Thanks for the heads up. Best, David On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 8:53 AM David Jacot wrote: > Hi Kirk, > > Yes, it is definitely possible if you can get the KIP voted before the KIP > freeze > and the code committed before the feature

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.1.0 release

Hi Kirk, Yes, it is definitely possible if you can get the KIP voted before the KIP freeze and the code committed before the feature freeze. Please, let me know when the KIP is voted and I will add it to the release plan. Thanks, David On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 7:05 PM Chris Egerton wrote: > Hi

[GitHub] [kafka-site] mjsax opened a new pull request #376: MINOR: remove note on future multi-cluster support of Kafka Streams

mjsax opened a new pull request #376: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/376 Follow up to https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11363 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to t

Re: [VOTE] KIP-770: Replace "buffered.records.per.partition" with "input.buffer.max.bytes"

We have 3 binding votes: Sophie/Guozhang/Mathias and 2 non-binding votes: Josep/Luke and no -1 votes. Marking this KIP as accepted. Thanks everyone! Thanks! Sagar. On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 7:18 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On 9/28/21 10:40 AM, Sagar wrote: > > Hi All, > > > >

Jenkins build is unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 2.8 #86

See

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #503

See Changes: -- [...truncated 493662 lines...] [2021-09-29T03:04:30.769Z] AclAuthorizerTest > testNoAclFoundOverride() PASSED [2021-09-29T03:04:30.769Z] [2021-09-29T03:04:3

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.0 #141

See

Re: [VOTE] KIP-770: Replace "buffered.records.per.partition" with "input.buffer.max.bytes"

+1 (binding) On 9/28/21 10:40 AM, Sagar wrote: Hi All, Bumping this vote thread again! Thanks! Sagar. On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 1:19 PM Luke Chen wrote: Thanks for the KIP. + 1 (non-binding) Thanks. Luke On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 2:48 PM Josep Prat wrote: +1 (non binding). Thanks for the

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 2.8 #85

See Changes: -- [...truncated 2407 lines...] [2021-09-29T01:15:35.571Z] > Task :compileTestJava NO-SOURCE [2021-09-29T01:15:35.571Z] > Task :streams:upgrade-system-tests-26:com

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #502

See Changes: -- [...truncated 492619 lines...] [2021-09-29T00:45:13.563Z] streams-2: SMOKE-TEST-CLIENT-CLOSED [2021-09-29T00:45:13.563Z] streams-3: SMOKE-TEST-CLIENT-CLOSED

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-13333) Optimize condition for triggering rebalance after wiping out corrupted task

A. Sophie Blee-Goldman created KAFKA-1: -- Summary: Optimize condition for triggering rebalance after wiping out corrupted task Key: KAFKA-1 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-12486) Utilize HighAvailabilityTaskAssignor to avoid downtime on corrupted task

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] A. Sophie Blee-Goldman resolved KAFKA-12486. Resolution: Fixed > Utilize HighAvailabilityTaskAssignor to avoid downtime

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-13332) New pattern-matched topic with more partitions than existing matched topics can crash Kafka Streams

A. Sophie Blee-Goldman created KAFKA-13332: -- Summary: New pattern-matched topic with more partitions than existing matched topics can crash Kafka Streams Key: KAFKA-13332 URL: https://issues.apache.org/ji

Re: [VOTE] KIP-775: Custom partitioners in foreign key joins

+1 (binding) Thanks, Victoria! -John On Tue, Sep 28, 2021, at 16:29, Adam Bellemare wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Glad to see this in here :) > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 5:11 PM Bill Bejeck wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 12:59 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote: >> >> > +1 (bindi

Re: [VOTE] KIP-775: Custom partitioners in foreign key joins

+1 (non-binding) Glad to see this in here :) On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 5:11 PM Bill Bejeck wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 12:59 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On 9/28/21 8:29 AM, Victoria Xia wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like to start a vote for K

Re: [VOTE] KIP-775: Custom partitioners in foreign key joins

+1 (binding) On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 12:59 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On 9/28/21 8:29 AM, Victoria Xia wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to start a vote for KIP-775 for adding Kafka Streams support for > > foreign key joins on tables with custom partitioners: > > > https://cw

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-13331) Slow reassignments in 2.8 because of large number of UpdateMetadataResponseReceived(UpdateMetadataResponseData(errorCode=0),) Events

GEORGE LI created KAFKA-13331: - Summary: Slow reassignments in 2.8 because of large number of UpdateMetadataResponseReceived(UpdateMetadataResponseData(errorCode=0),) Events Key: KAFKA-13331 URL: https://issues.apac

Re: [VOTE] KIP-770: Replace "buffered.records.per.partition" with "input.buffer.max.bytes"

Hi All, Bumping this vote thread again! Thanks! Sagar. On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 1:19 PM Luke Chen wrote: > Thanks for the KIP. > > + 1 (non-binding) > > Thanks. > Luke > > On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 2:48 PM Josep Prat > wrote: > > > +1 (non binding). > > > > Thanks for the KIP Sagar! > > ——— > > Jo

Re: [VOTE] KIP-630: Kafka Raft Snapshot

During the development of KIP-630 we made some minor changes to the KIP to better match the implementation details. Here is a summary of the changes we made to the KIP: 1. Added control records at the begin and end of the snapshots. The control records are versioned. The snapshot header record inc

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-630: Kafka Raft Snapshot

During the development of KIP-630 we made some minor changes to the KIP to better match the implementation details. Here is a summary of the changes we made to the KIP: 1. Added control records at the begin and end of the snapshots. The control records are versioned. The snapshot header record inc

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.1.0 release

Hi David, Wondering if we can get KIP-618 included? The vote passed months ago and a PR has been available since mid-June. Cheers, Chris On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 12:53 PM Kirk True wrote: > Hi David, > > Is it possible to try to get KIP-768 in 3.1? I have put it up for a vote > and have much o

Re: [VOTE] KIP-775: Custom partitioners in foreign key joins

+1 (binding) On 9/28/21 8:29 AM, Victoria Xia wrote: Hi all, I'd like to start a vote for KIP-775 for adding Kafka Streams support for foreign key joins on tables with custom partitioners: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-775%3A+Custom+partitioners+in+foreign+key+joins Tha

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.1.0 release

Hi David, Is it possible to try to get KIP-768 in 3.1? I have put it up for a vote and have much of it implemented already. Thanks, Kirk On Tue, Sep 28, 2021, at 3:11 AM, Israel Ekpo wrote: > Ok. Sounds good, David. > > Let’s forge ahead. The plan looks good. > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 4:02

[VOTE] KIP-775: Custom partitioners in foreign key joins

Hi all, I'd like to start a vote for KIP-775 for adding Kafka Streams support for foreign key joins on tables with custom partitioners: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-775%3A+Custom+partitioners+in+foreign+key+joins Thanks, Victoria

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #501

See Changes: -- [...truncated 493908 lines...] [2021-09-28T10:40:31.499Z] [2021-09-28T10:40:31.499Z] EpochDrivenReplicationProtocolAcceptanceWithIbp26Test > logsShouldNot

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.1.0 release

Ok. Sounds good, David. Let’s forge ahead. The plan looks good. On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 4:02 AM David Jacot wrote: > Hi Israel, > > Yeah, 3.0 took quite a long time to be released. However, I think > that we should stick to our time based release. > > Best, > David > > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at

Re: [kafka-clients] Re: [DISCUSS] Before you Vote for Apache Kafka RCs, Watch This!

Thanks for the feedback, David. On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 4:05 AM David Jacot wrote: > Israel, > > I am not aware of any apache docker repository. It seems preferable > to keep it in your own repository at this stage. Otherwise, you would > depend on committers/PMC members to update the image whic

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #500

See Changes: -- [...truncated 493859 lines...] [2021-09-28T08:40:14.954Z] > Task :raft:testClasses UP-TO-DATE [2021-09-28T08:40:14.954Z] > Task :connect:json:testJar [2021-0

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-13330) Incorrect topic configurations can damage cluster health

Florian Rossier created KAFKA-13330: --- Summary: Incorrect topic configurations can damage cluster health Key: KAFKA-13330 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13330 Project: Kafka

Re: [kafka-clients] Re: [DISCUSS] Before you Vote for Apache Kafka RCs, Watch This!

Israel, I am not aware of any apache docker repository. It seems preferable to keep it in your own repository at this stage. Otherwise, you would depend on committers/PMC members to update the image which is not ideal for your project, I suppose. Best, David On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 12:56 PM Isra

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.1.0 release

Hi Israel, Yeah, 3.0 took quite a long time to be released. However, I think that we should stick to our time based release. Best, David On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 9:59 AM David Jacot wrote: > Hi Bruno, > > Thanks for the heads up. I have removed it from the plan. > > Best, > David > > On Mon, S

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.1.0 release

Hi Bruno, Thanks for the heads up. I have removed it from the plan. Best, David On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 11:04 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote: > Hi David, > > Thank you for the plan! > > KIP-698 will not make it for 3.1.0. Could you please remove it from the > plan? > > Best, > Bruno > > On 24.09.21 16