Re: [VOTE] KIP-719: Add Log4J2 Appender

> VerifiableLog4jAppender is used for system tests, it's not a user facing tool. We don't need it to support log4j 2. I mean, as long as there is VerifiableLog4jAppender which uses log4j-appender, we can't entirely remove log4j 1.x artifact from the classpath, regardless of if it is a user-facing

Jenkins build is unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #220

See

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #218

See Changes: -- [...truncated 406831 lines...] [2021-06-13T19:55:02.189Z] [INFO] Using property: package = myapps [2021-06-13T19:55:02.189Z] Confirm properties configuration

Re: [VOTE] KIP-719: Add Log4J2 Appender

VerifiableLog4jAppender is used for system tests, it's not a user facing tool. We don't need it to support log4j 2. Ismael On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 8:12 AM Dongjin Lee wrote: > Hi Ismael, > > > Can't we work with the log4j community to support the alternative format? > > It seems not. > > 1. Cha

Re: [VOTE] KIP-719: Add Log4J2 Appender

Hi Ismael, > Can't we work with the log4j community to support the alternative format? It seems not. 1. Changing the format of current log4j2's Kafka Appender implementation means causing inconvenience to the existing users by changing API semantics. (In my opinion, the log4j community did not t