Thanks D C. Thanks a lot . That is quite a detailed explanation.
If I understand correctly, ( ignoring the case where producers
create transactions) - since the replica is down and never comes , the high
watermark CANNOT advance and the consumer CAN NOT read the messages which
were sent after the r
As I understand it, the consumer can only read "committed" messages - which
I believe, if we look at internals of it, committed messages are nothing
but messages which are upto the high watermark.
*The high watermark is the offset of the last message that was successfully
copied to all of the log’s
Xavier, I'm dismayed to see some of these instances are my fault. Fully
support your plan.
John, I had the same thought -- "list" is extraneous here. In the case of
"topics.whitelist" we already have precedent to just use "topics".
Ryanne
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020, 12:43 PM John Roesler wrote:
> Th
Thanks Xavier!
I’m +1 on this idea, and I’m glad this is the extent of what needs to be
changed. I recall when I joined the project being pleased at the lack of common
offensive terminology. I hadn’t considered whitelist/blacklist, but I can see
the argument.
Allowlist/blocklist are kind of a
Yes. Thank you.
> On Jun 20, 2020, at 12:20 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> Thank you so much for this initiative. Small change, but it makes our
> community more inclusive.
>
> Gwen
>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020, 6:02 PM Xavier Léauté wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> There are a number of places i
